QSR vs. SLGN
QSR (Restaurant Brands International Inc.) and SLGN (Silgan Holdings Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — QSR in Restaurants, SLGN in Packaging & Containers. Over the past 10 years, QSR returned 8.56%/yr vs 6.54%/yr for SLGN. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
QSR vs. SLGN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSR achieves a 10.44% return, which is significantly higher than SLGN's 0.09% return. Over the past 10 years, QSR has outperformed SLGN with an annualized return of 8.56%, while SLGN has yielded a comparatively lower 6.54% annualized return.
QSR
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- 6M
- 12.49%
- YTD
- 10.44%
- 1Y
- 12.85%
- 3Y*
- 2.88%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- 8.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.50%
SLGN
- 1D
- -2.63%
- 1M
- -13.82%
- 6M
- -6.36%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- -10.72%
- 3Y*
- -1.48%
- 5Y*
- 1.32%
- 10Y*
- 6.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $146.87M | $201.15M | $244.46M | |
| $103.33M | $73.26M | $47.98M |
QSR vs. SLGN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 10.44% | 8.64% | -13.80% | 24.64% | 10.72% | 2.72% | -0.34% | 25.61% | -12.15% | 30.69% |
SLGN Silgan Holdings Inc. | 0.09% | -21.11% | 16.80% | -11.33% | 22.68% | 17.06% | 21.06% | 33.55% | -18.44% | 16.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSR and SLGN is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2014 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
QSR:
$25.68B
SLGN:
$4.23B
QSR:
$2.09
SLGN:
$2.55
QSR:
35.47
SLGN:
15.69
QSR:
3.53
SLGN:
0.63
QSR:
$9.59B
SLGN:
$6.68B
QSR:
$3.17B
SLGN:
$1.14B
QSR:
$2.49B
SLGN:
$845.13M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSR vs. SLGN — Risk / Return Rank
QSR
SLGN
QSR vs. SLGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QSR | SLGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.95 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | -0.49 | +1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.19 | -0.92 | +3.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSR vs. SLGN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSR drawdown since its inception was -63.03%, smaller than the maximum SLGN drawdown of -86.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSR and SLGN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSR | SLGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.03% | -86.14% | +23.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.45% | -25.09% | +12.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.53% | -35.03% | +10.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.41% | -35.03% | +7.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.03% | -35.03% | -28.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.54% | -28.32% | +19.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.00% | -16.65% | +4.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.01% | 13.46% | -7.45% |
Volatility
QSR vs. SLGN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) is 8.37%, while Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) has a volatility of 14.81%. This indicates that QSR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLGN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSR | SLGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.37% | 14.81% | -6.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.97% | 25.56% | -6.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.07% | 32.24% | -8.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.81% | 26.59% | -3.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.54% | 24.26% | +3.28% |
Dividends
QSR vs. SLGN - Dividend Comparison
QSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than SLGN's 2.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 3.43% | 3.63% | 3.56% | 2.82% | 3.34% | 3.49% | 3.40% | 3.14% | 3.44% | 1.27% | 1.30% | 1.18% |
SLGN Silgan Holdings Inc. | 2.05% | 1.98% | 1.46% | 1.59% | 1.23% | 1.31% | 1.29% | 1.42% | 1.69% | 1.22% | 1.33% | 1.19% |
Financials
QSR vs. SLGN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Silgan Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
QSR vs. SLGN - Profitability Comparison
QSR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SLGN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Silgan Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 294.90M and revenue of 1.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.0%.
QSR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported an operating income of 606.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.8%.
SLGN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Silgan Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 168.10M and revenue of 1.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.2%.
QSR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a net income of 338.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.
SLGN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Silgan Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 75.80M and revenue of 1.64B, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
QSR and SLGN have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLGN has higher volatility (14.81%) compared to QSR (8.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSR dropped -63.03% vs SLGN's -86.14%.
QSR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QSR and SLGN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer