PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSPRX vs. QMHNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QSPRX vs. QMHNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSPRX achieves a 13.78% return, which is significantly lower than QMHNX's 18.97% return. Over the past 10 years, QSPRX has outperformed QMHNX with an annualized return of 7.60%, while QMHNX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.60% annualized return.


QSPRX

1D
0.81%
1M
2.38%
YTD
13.78%
6M
15.35%
1Y
20.12%
3Y*
21.83%
5Y*
19.23%
10Y*
7.60%

QMHNX

1D
1.11%
1M
2.34%
YTD
18.97%
6M
22.10%
1Y
34.84%
3Y*
16.46%
5Y*
16.21%
10Y*
5.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSPRX vs. QMHNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QSPRX
AQR Style Premia Alternative R6
13.78%14.94%21.60%12.50%30.90%25.14%-21.91%-8.10%-12.32%12.18%
QMHNX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N
18.97%19.65%10.48%-0.40%49.64%-2.30%-0.85%1.55%-14.59%-2.06%

Correlation

The correlation between QSPRX and QMHNX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QSPRX vs. QMHNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSPRX
QSPRX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
QSPRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSPRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSPRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
QSPRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSPRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

QMHNX
QMHNX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QMHNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMHNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMHNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QMHNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMHNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSPRX vs. QMHNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QSPRXQMHNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.47

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

7.34

-3.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.93

21.53

-11.60

QSPRX vs. QMHNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSPRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the QMHNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSPRX and QMHNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QSPRXQMHNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

2.77

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

0.94

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.36

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.37

+0.22

Drawdowns

QSPRX vs. QMHNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSPRX drawdown since its inception was -41.22%, roughly equal to the maximum QMHNX drawdown of -40.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSPRX and QMHNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QSPRXQMHNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.22%

-40.29%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.06%

-4.81%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.25%

-19.23%

+9.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.17%

-19.23%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.22%

-35.34%

-5.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.08%

-18.28%

+8.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.63%

+0.28%

Volatility

QSPRX vs. QMHNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX) is 3.08%, while AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that QSPRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMHNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QSPRXQMHNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

3.78%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.18%

9.63%

-2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.58%

12.74%

-3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.91%

17.31%

-1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.86%

15.47%

-2.61%

QSPRX vs. QMHNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSPRX has a 5.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QMHNX's 4.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

QSPRX vs. QMHNX - Dividend Comparison

QSPRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than QMHNX's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QMHNX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N
1.59%1.89%2.09%7.36%8.75%10.64%7.79%3.80%0.00%0.00%0.01%7.47%
QSPRX
AQR Style Premia Alternative R6
2.31%2.63%6.99%23.75%22.67%12.85%0.00%1.62%1.09%7.15%1.74%5.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


QSPRX and QMHNX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QMHNX has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to QSPRX (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSPRX dropped -41.22% vs QMHNX's -40.29%.

QMHNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QSPRX and QMHNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer