PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSPMX vs. CONWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QSPMX vs. CONWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified Pattern Recognition Fund (QSPMX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QSPMX vs. CONWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QSPMX
Quantified Pattern Recognition Fund
-9.64%27.23%18.38%13.84%-18.49%33.83%-0.34%11.49%
CONWX
Concorde Wealth Management Fund
8.18%11.95%13.58%0.20%-2.51%19.73%8.76%6.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSPMX achieves a -9.64% return, which is significantly lower than CONWX's 8.18% return.


QSPMX

1D
-0.23%
1M
-10.44%
YTD
-9.64%
6M
-0.78%
1Y
17.68%
3Y*
11.98%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*

CONWX

1D
-0.62%
1M
-1.70%
YTD
8.18%
6M
11.51%
1Y
17.28%
3Y*
12.45%
5Y*
7.53%
10Y*
8.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QSPMX vs. CONWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSPMX has a 1.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CONWX's 1.41% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QSPMX vs. CONWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSPMX
QSPMX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
QSPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
QSPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

CONWX
CONWX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CONWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CONWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
CONWX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CONWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
CONWX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSPMX vs. CONWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Pattern Recognition Fund (QSPMX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QSPMXCONWXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

1.70

-0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.62

2.36

-0.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.37

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

1.99

-0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.75

11.30

-5.55

QSPMX vs. CONWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSPMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the CONWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSPMX and CONWX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QSPMXCONWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

1.70

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.74

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.78

-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between QSPMX and CONWX is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QSPMX vs. CONWX - Dividend Comparison

QSPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than CONWX's 3.41% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
QSPMX
Quantified Pattern Recognition Fund
1.64%1.48%2.26%3.99%0.13%26.85%0.21%3.81%0.00%0.00%
CONWX
Concorde Wealth Management Fund
3.41%3.69%10.55%2.16%7.85%3.63%3.86%2.16%5.09%2.48%

Drawdowns

QSPMX vs. CONWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSPMX drawdown since its inception was -28.36%, which is greater than CONWX's maximum drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSPMX and CONWX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QSPMXCONWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.36%

-26.09%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.86%

-8.60%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.36%

-12.49%

-15.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.86%

-2.03%

-10.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.09%

-2.78%

-4.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

1.52%

+1.68%

Volatility

QSPMX vs. CONWX - Volatility Comparison

Quantified Pattern Recognition Fund (QSPMX) has a higher volatility of 6.17% compared to Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX) at 2.12%. This indicates that QSPMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CONWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QSPMXCONWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.17%

2.12%

+4.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.04%

5.43%

+6.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.38%

10.70%

+8.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.58%

10.26%

+7.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.62%

11.15%

+7.47%