QSOL vs. MNRS

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

QSOL (Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF) and MNRS (Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return, while MNRS is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Bitcoin Miners Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QSOL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MNRS.

Performance

QSOL vs. MNRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL) and Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSOL achieves a -38.08% return, which is significantly lower than MNRS's 11.06% return.

QSOL

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: 3.11%
• 6M: -45.69%
• YTD: -38.08%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MNRS

• 1D: -7.89%
• 1M: -30.06%
• 6M: -9.69%
• YTD: 11.06%
• 1Y: 17.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSOL vs. MNRS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF	-38.08%	-4.28%
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF	11.06%	-11.72%

Correlation

The correlation between QSOL and MNRS is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025	0.55

Return for Risk

QSOL vs. MNRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSOL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MNRS

MNRS Risk / Return Rank: 15
MNRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
MNRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
MNRS Omega Ratio Rank: 18
MNRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
MNRS Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSOL vs. MNRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL) and Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QSOL	MNRS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.25	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.86	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.10	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.31	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	0.59	—

Drawdowns

QSOL vs. MNRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSOL drawdown since its inception was -56.55%, roughly equal to the maximum MNRS drawdown of -56.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSOL and MNRS.

Drawdown Indicators

	QSOL	MNRS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.55%	-56.70%	+0.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-56.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.94%	-38.78%	-9.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.45%	-23.57%	-11.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	30.02%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QSOL	MNRS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	17.51%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	53.33%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.51%	72.04%	-0.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.51%	70.79%	+0.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.51%	70.79%	+0.72%

QSOL vs. MNRS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MNRS's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

QSOL vs. MNRS - Dividend Comparison

QSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than MNRS's 0.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.49%	0.54%
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF	0.90%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QSOL and MNRS in my portfolio?

QSOL and MNRS have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QSOL or MNRS?

On fees, QSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QSOL or MNRS?

QSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MNRS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QSOL or MNRS?

QSOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.49% for MNRS.

What is the main difference between QSOL and MNRS?

QSOL is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while MNRS is Blockchain. QSOL tracks Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return, while MNRS tracks Indxx Bitcoin Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QSOL and 0.59% for MNRS.