QSML vs. DLN
QSML (Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund) and DLN (WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QSML is a Quality Factor fund tracking the WisdomTree US SmallCap Quality Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DLN is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QSML returned 31.80% vs 22.57% for DLN. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QSML charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DLN.
Performance
QSML vs. DLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSML achieves a 19.46% return, which is significantly higher than DLN's 13.81% return.
QSML
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- 6M
- 15.89%
- YTD
- 19.46%
- 1Y
- 31.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.80%
DLN
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- 6M
- 9.47%
- YTD
- 13.81%
- 1Y
- 22.57%
- 3Y*
- 18.10%
- 5Y*
- 12.59%
- 10Y*
- 12.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.06M | $9.95M | $12.21M | |
| $17.22K | $17.81K | $19.02K |
QSML vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QSML Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund | 19.46% | 5.49% | 9.93% |
DLN WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund | 13.81% | 15.53% | 18.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSML and DLN is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024 | 0.73 |
The correlation between QSML and DLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
QSML vs. DLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QSML
DLN
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
QSML
DLN
Consumer Cyclical
QSML
DLN
Financial Services
QSML
DLN
Industrials
QSML
DLN
Healthcare
QSML
DLN
Consumer Defensive
QSML
DLN
Energy
QSML
DLN
Communication Services
QSML
DLN
Basic Materials
QSML
DLN
Real Estate
QSML
DLN
Utilities
QSML
DLN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSML vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank
QSML
DLN
QSML vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) and WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QSML | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.46 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 3.72 | -0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.05 | 15.65 | -5.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSML vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSML drawdown since its inception was -28.54%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSML and DLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSML | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.54% | -57.84% | +29.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.72% | -6.10% | -4.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.63% | -7.47% | +1.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 1.45% | +1.72% |
Volatility
QSML vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison
Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN) at 2.34%. This indicates that QSML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSML | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 2.34% | +2.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.38% | 6.92% | +5.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.49% | 8.99% | +8.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 13.24% | +7.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 16.12% | +4.47% |
QSML vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
QSML has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
QSML vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison
QSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than DLN's 1.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLN WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund | 1.74% | 1.90% | 2.00% | 2.43% | 2.53% | 2.01% | 2.66% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 2.33% | 2.64% | 2.80% |
QSML Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund | 0.52% | 0.62% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QSML and DLN have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QSML has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to DLN (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSML dropped -28.54% vs DLN's -57.84%.
On 1-year performance, QSML leads with 31.80% vs 22.57% for DLN. On fees, DLN is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QSML has performed better with a 31.80% return vs 22.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DLN is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for QSML.
DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.52% for QSML.
QSML is categorized as Quality Factor, while DLN is Large Cap Value Equities. QSML tracks WisdomTree US SmallCap Quality Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DLN tracks WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for QSML and 0.28% for DLN.
DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QSML and DLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer