PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSML vs. DHS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QSML vs. DHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSML achieves a 8.06% return, which is significantly lower than DHS's 9.88% return.


QSML

1D
-0.96%
1M
2.05%
YTD
8.06%
6M
7.79%
1Y
21.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DHS

1D
-0.67%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
9.88%
6M
10.38%
1Y
20.55%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
9.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSML vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QSML
Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund
8.06%5.49%10.38%
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
9.88%12.87%18.20%

Correlation

The correlation between QSML and DHS is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024

0.61

The correlation between QSML and DHS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

QSML vs. DHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QSML
DHS

Technology

18.4%
3.7%

Industrials

17.9%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

16.2%
5.0%

Financial Services

13.2%
22.3%

Healthcare

10.4%
14.5%

Energy

9.5%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
18.7%

Communication Services

3.3%
9.3%

Basic Materials

3.2%
1.2%

Real Estate

0.3%
2.8%

Utilities

0.2%
9.0%

Technology

QSML
18.4%
DHS
3.7%

Industrials

QSML
17.9%
DHS
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

QSML
16.2%
DHS
5.0%

Financial Services

QSML
13.2%
DHS
22.3%

Healthcare

QSML
10.4%
DHS
14.5%

Energy

QSML
9.5%
DHS
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

QSML
7.4%
DHS
18.7%

Communication Services

QSML
3.3%
DHS
9.3%

Basic Materials

QSML
3.2%
DHS
1.2%

Real Estate

QSML
0.3%
DHS
2.8%

Utilities

QSML
0.2%
DHS
9.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QSML vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSML
QSML Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
QSML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSML Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSML Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
QSML Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSML Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

DHS
DHS Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
DHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHS Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHS Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSML vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QSMLDHSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.35

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

3.28

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.71

12.04

-5.33

QSML vs. DHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSML Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the DHS Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSML and DHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QSMLDHSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

2.06

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.41

+0.09

Drawdowns

QSML vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSML drawdown since its inception was -28.54%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSML and DHS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QSMLDHSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.54%

-67.25%

+38.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.72%

-6.30%

-4.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-2.60%

+1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-9.55%

+3.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

1.71%

+1.52%

Volatility

QSML vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison

Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) at 2.88%. This indicates that QSML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QSMLDHSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

2.88%

+1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.86%

7.32%

+4.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.46%

10.01%

+7.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.86%

13.89%

+6.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.86%

16.08%

+4.78%

QSML vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QSML and DHS have an expense ratio of 0.38%.


Dividends

QSML vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison

QSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than DHS's 3.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
3.35%3.32%3.66%4.31%3.42%3.29%4.14%3.69%3.76%3.00%3.25%3.53%
QSML
Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund
0.58%0.62%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QSML and DHS have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QSML has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to DHS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSML dropped -28.54% vs DHS's -67.25%.

On 1-year performance, QSML leads with 21.62% vs 20.55% for DHS. Both ETFs have the same 0.38% expense ratio. On volatility, DHS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QSML has performed better with a 21.62% return vs 20.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QSML and DHS have the same expense ratio: 0.38% per year.

DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 0.58% for QSML.

QSML is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities. QSML tracks WisdomTree US SmallCap Quality Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DHS tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index.

DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QSML and DHS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer