QSIX vs. TRFK

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QSIX (Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF) and TRFK (Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QSIX is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index, while TRFK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QSIX returned 32.02% vs 85.46% for TRFK. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.

Performance

QSIX vs. TRFK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSIX achieves a 15.33% return, which is significantly lower than TRFK's 61.41% return.

QSIX

• 1D: -2.89%
• 1M: -0.31%
• YTD: 15.33%
• 6M: 13.92%
• 1Y: 32.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TRFK

• 1D: -6.99%
• 1M: 9.38%
• YTD: 61.41%
• 6M: 59.46%
• 1Y: 85.46%
• 3Y*: 50.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSIX vs. TRFK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QSIX Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF	15.33%	18.54%	4.81%
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF	61.41%	26.81%	9.23%

Correlation

The correlation between QSIX and TRFK is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024	0.86

The correlation between QSIX and TRFK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QSIX vs. TRFK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSIX

QSIX Risk / Return Rank: 64
QSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
QSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
QSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
QSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

TRFK

TRFK Risk / Return Rank: 76
TRFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
TRFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
TRFK Omega Ratio Rank: 75
TRFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
TRFK Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSIX vs. TRFK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QSIX	TRFK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	2.69	-0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	3.14	-0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.42	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	4.39	-1.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.01	10.31	+0.70

QSIX vs. TRFK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the TRFK Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSIX and TRFK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QSIX vs. TRFK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSIX drawdown since its inception was -20.72%, smaller than the maximum TRFK drawdown of -29.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSIX and TRFK.

Drawdown Indicators

	QSIX	TRFK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.72%	-29.06%	+8.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.05%	-19.56%	+8.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.91%	-6.99%	+3.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.05%	-6.04%	+2.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.92%	8.32%	-5.40%

Volatility

QSIX vs. TRFK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) is 8.16%, while Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) has a volatility of 18.36%. This indicates that QSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRFK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QSIX	TRFK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.16%	18.36%	-10.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.28%	26.50%	-13.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.41%	32.01%	-15.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.76%	29.84%	-10.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.76%	29.84%	-10.08%

QSIX vs. TRFK - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QSIX and TRFK have an expense ratio of 0.60%.

Dividends

QSIX vs. TRFK - Dividend Comparison

QSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, more than TRFK's 0.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
QSIX Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF	3.96%	4.02%	1.07%	0.00%	0.00%
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.40%	0.20%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QSIX and TRFK in my portfolio?

QSIX and TRFK have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QSIX or TRFK?

TRFK has higher volatility (18.36%) compared to QSIX (8.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSIX dropped -20.72% vs TRFK's -29.06%.

Which ETF is better, QSIX or TRFK?

On 1-year performance, TRFK leads with 85.46% vs 32.02% for QSIX. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, QSIX has been the lower-risk option at 8.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QSIX or TRFK?

Over the 1-year period, TRFK has performed better with a 85.46% return vs 32.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QSIX or TRFK?

QSIX and TRFK have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QSIX or TRFK?

QSIX has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 0.01% for TRFK.

What is the main difference between QSIX and TRFK?

QSIX is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while TRFK is Technology Equities. QSIX tracks Nasdaq-100 Index, while TRFK tracks Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRFK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.