QSIX vs. PTNQ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QSIX (Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF) and PTNQ (Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QSIX is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index, while PTNQ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QSIX returned 37.26% vs 31.85% for PTNQ. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QSIX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PTNQ.

Performance

QSIX vs. PTNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSIX achieves a 19.16% return, which is significantly higher than PTNQ's 13.51% return.

QSIX

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 8.46%
• YTD: 19.16%
• 6M: 17.84%
• 1Y: 37.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PTNQ

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 8.66%
• YTD: 13.51%
• 6M: 12.12%
• 1Y: 31.85%
• 3Y*: 15.29%
• 5Y*: 11.75%
• 10Y*: 16.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSIX vs. PTNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QSIX Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF	19.16%	18.54%	4.66%
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF	13.51%	7.18%	3.21%

Correlation

The correlation between QSIX and PTNQ is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024	0.91

The correlation between QSIX and PTNQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QSIX vs. PTNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSIX

QSIX Risk / Return Rank: 74
QSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
QSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
QSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

PTNQ

PTNQ Risk / Return Rank: 58
PTNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
PTNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
PTNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 58
PTNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
PTNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSIX vs. PTNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QSIX	PTNQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	2.06	+0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.38	2.72	+0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.35	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.39	2.72	+0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.29	9.24	+4.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QSIX vs. PTNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the PTNQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSIX and PTNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QSIX	PTNQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.54	2.06	+0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.99	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.37	0.81	+0.56

Drawdowns

QSIX vs. PTNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSIX drawdown since its inception was -20.72%, smaller than the maximum PTNQ drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSIX and PTNQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	QSIX	PTNQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.72%	-28.07%	+7.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.05%	-11.76%	+0.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.19%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.47%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	-0.72%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.06%	-5.69%	+2.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.81%	3.46%	-0.65%

Volatility

QSIX vs. PTNQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) is 4.10%, while Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that QSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QSIX	PTNQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.10%	4.64%	-0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.23%	11.47%	-0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.71%	15.56%	-0.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.16%	12.89%	+6.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.16%	16.37%	+2.79%

QSIX vs. PTNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSIX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PTNQ's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

QSIX vs. PTNQ - Dividend Comparison

QSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than PTNQ's 0.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF	0.78%	0.88%	1.96%	1.47%	0.62%	0.00%	0.16%	0.44%	0.45%	0.32%	0.30%	0.22%
QSIX Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF	3.84%	4.02%	1.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QSIX and PTNQ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, QSIX and PTNQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QSIX or PTNQ?

PTNQ has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to QSIX (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSIX dropped -20.72% vs PTNQ's -28.07%.

Which ETF is better, QSIX or PTNQ?

On 1-year performance, QSIX leads with 37.26% vs 31.85% for PTNQ. On fees, QSIX is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QSIX has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QSIX or PTNQ?

Over the 1-year period, QSIX has performed better with a 37.26% return vs 31.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QSIX or PTNQ?

QSIX is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PTNQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QSIX or PTNQ?

QSIX has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 0.78% for PTNQ.

What is the main difference between QSIX and PTNQ?

QSIX is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while PTNQ is Large Cap Blend Equities. QSIX tracks Nasdaq-100 Index, while PTNQ tracks Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QSIX and 0.65% for PTNQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.