QSIX vs. PBP
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP).
QSIX and PBP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QSIX is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. It was launched on Sep 23, 2024. PBP is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2007. Both QSIX and PBP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QSIX vs. PBP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QSIX vs. PBP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QSIX Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF | -5.58% | 18.54% | 4.66% |
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | -1.04% | 8.49% | 6.14% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSIX achieves a -5.58% return, which is significantly lower than PBP's -1.04% return.
QSIX
- 1D
- 3.15%
- 1M
- -4.45%
- YTD
- -5.58%
- 6M
- -3.43%
- 1Y
- 20.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBP
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- -1.04%
- 6M
- 5.76%
- 1Y
- 11.29%
- 3Y*
- 10.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.48%
- 10Y*
- 6.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QSIX vs. PBP - Expense Ratio Comparison
QSIX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PBP's 0.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QSIX vs. PBP — Risk / Return Rank
QSIX
PBP
QSIX vs. PBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QSIX | PBP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 0.80 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.59 | 1.27 | +0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.25 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 1.12 | +0.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.68 | 6.40 | +0.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QSIX | PBP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 0.80 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.32 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between QSIX and PBP is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QSIX vs. PBP - Dividend Comparison
QSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than PBP's 11.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSIX Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF | 4.23% | 4.02% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 11.63% | 11.12% | 9.36% | 3.35% | 1.33% | 6.21% | 1.41% | 5.04% | 2.59% | 10.86% | 2.56% | 6.19% |
Drawdowns
QSIX vs. PBP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSIX drawdown since its inception was -20.72%, smaller than the maximum PBP drawdown of -43.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSIX and PBP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSIX | PBP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.72% | -43.43% | +22.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.50% | -10.20% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.24% | -3.29% | -4.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.28% | -6.75% | +3.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 1.79% | +1.31% |
Volatility
QSIX vs. PBP - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) at 4.09%. This indicates that QSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QSIX | PBP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 4.09% | +1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.80% | 5.97% | +5.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.44% | 14.26% | +6.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 11.95% | +7.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 13.69% | +5.87% |