QSIX vs. EIPI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) and FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI).

QSIX and EIPI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QSIX is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. It was launched on Sep 23, 2024. EIPI is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Sep 27, 2011.

Performance

QSIX vs. EIPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) and FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QSIX vs. EIPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QSIX Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF	-5.58%	18.54%	4.66%
EIPI FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF	15.17%	12.38%	3.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSIX achieves a -5.58% return, which is significantly lower than EIPI's 15.17% return.

QSIX

• 1D: 3.15%
• 1M: -4.45%
• YTD: -5.58%
• 6M: -3.43%
• 1Y: 20.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EIPI

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 1.92%
• YTD: 15.17%
• 6M: 17.66%
• 1Y: 19.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSIX vs. EIPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSIX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than EIPI's 1.11% expense ratio.

EIPI

FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF

QSIX

Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF

Return for Risk

QSIX vs. EIPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSIX

QSIX Risk / Return Rank: 62
QSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
QSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
QSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

EIPI

EIPI Risk / Return Rank: 72
EIPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
EIPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
EIPI Omega Ratio Rank: 78
EIPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
EIPI Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSIX vs. EIPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) and FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QSIX	EIPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	1.40	-0.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.59	1.82	-0.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.30	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	1.62	+0.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.68	7.06	-0.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QSIX vs. EIPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the EIPI Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSIX and EIPI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QSIX	EIPI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	1.40	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	1.68	-1.11

Correlation

The correlation between QSIX and EIPI is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

QSIX vs. EIPI - Dividend Comparison

QSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than EIPI's 6.67% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
QSIX Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF	4.23%	4.02%	1.07%
EIPI FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF	6.67%	9.71%	6.31%

Drawdowns

QSIX vs. EIPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSIX drawdown since its inception was -20.72%, which is greater than EIPI's maximum drawdown of -12.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSIX and EIPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	QSIX	EIPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.72%	-12.33%	-8.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.50%	-12.33%	+0.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.24%	-0.49%	-7.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.28%	-1.68%	-1.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.10%	2.82%	+0.28%

Volatility

QSIX vs. EIPI - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI) at 2.58%. This indicates that QSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QSIX	EIPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.92%	2.58%	+3.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.80%	6.88%	+4.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.44%	13.97%	+6.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.56%	13.24%	+6.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.56%	13.24%	+6.32%