QSIX vs. EINC
QSIX (Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QSIX is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QSIX returned 32.02% vs 29.82% for EINC. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QSIX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.
Performance
QSIX vs. EINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSIX achieves a 15.33% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 25.97% return.
QSIX
- 1D
- -2.89%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- 15.33%
- 6M
- 13.92%
- 1Y
- 32.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EINC
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -4.50%
- YTD
- 25.97%
- 6M
- 25.98%
- 1Y
- 29.82%
- 3Y*
- 30.36%
- 5Y*
- 21.18%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
QSIX vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QSIX Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF | 15.33% | 18.54% | 4.81% |
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 25.97% | 7.11% | 10.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSIX and EINC is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024 | 0.10 |
The correlation between QSIX and EINC shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSIX vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank
QSIX
EINC
QSIX vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QSIX | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 3.80 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.01 | 9.63 | +1.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSIX vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSIX drawdown since its inception was -20.72%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSIX and EINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSIX | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.72% | -87.55% | +66.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.05% | -7.89% | -3.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.91% | -4.50% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.05% | -44.15% | +41.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 3.10% | -0.18% |
Volatility
QSIX vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) has a higher volatility of 8.16% compared to VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) at 6.51%. This indicates that QSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSIX | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.16% | 6.51% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.28% | 11.88% | +1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.41% | 15.10% | +1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 19.54% | +0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 25.43% | -5.67% |
QSIX vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
QSIX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
QSIX vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison
QSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, more than EINC's 3.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 3.51% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
QSIX Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF | 3.96% | 4.02% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QSIX and EINC have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QSIX has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to EINC (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSIX dropped -20.72% vs EINC's -87.55%.
On 1-year performance, QSIX leads with 32.02% vs 29.82% for EINC. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, EINC has been the lower-risk option at 6.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QSIX has performed better with a 32.02% return vs 29.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QSIX.
QSIX has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 3.51% for EINC.
QSIX is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while EINC is Energy Equities. QSIX tracks Nasdaq-100 Index, while EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QSIX and 0.45% for EINC.
EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QSIX and EINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer