PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QS vs. LEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QS vs. LEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QuantumScape Corporation (QS) and Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QS having a -31.96% return and LEU slightly lower at -33.03%.


QS

1D
-1.94%
1M
-18.13%
YTD
-31.96%
6M
-39.92%
1Y
57.91%
3Y*
-1.86%
5Y*
-23.97%
10Y*

LEU

1D
2.46%
1M
-15.46%
YTD
-33.03%
6M
-34.71%
1Y
2.61%
3Y*
68.75%
5Y*
43.53%
10Y*
47.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QS vs. LEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QS
QuantumScape Corporation
-31.96%100.77%-25.32%22.57%-74.45%-73.72%757.36%
LEU
Centrus Energy Corp.
-33.03%264.45%22.42%67.52%-34.92%115.78%34.48%

Correlation

The correlation between QS and LEU is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2020

0.40

The correlation between QS and LEU shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QS:

$4.33B

LEU:

$3.65B

EPS

QS:

-$0.72

LEU:

$2.89

PB Ratio

QS:

3.90

LEU:

4.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

QS:

$0.00

LEU:

$452.30M

Gross Profit (TTM)

QS:

-$49.03M

LEU:

$116.10M

EBITDA (TTM)

QS:

-$378.92M

LEU:

$70.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QS vs. LEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QS
QS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
QS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QS Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

LEU
LEU Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
LEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEU Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
LEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEU Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QS vs. LEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QuantumScape Corporation (QS) and Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QSLEUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.08

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

0.04

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.33

0.07

+1.26

QS vs. LEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QS Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is higher than the LEU Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QS and LEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QS vs. LEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QS drawdown since its inception was -97.36%, roughly equal to the maximum LEU drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QS and LEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QSLEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.36%

-99.98%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.68%

-66.37%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.93%

-66.37%

-7.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.45%

-78.23%

-13.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.62%

-97.60%

+2.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-85.52%

-73.98%

-11.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.64%

38.60%

+5.04%

Volatility

QS vs. LEU - Volatility Comparison

QuantumScape Corporation (QS) has a higher volatility of 25.60% compared to Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) at 24.20%. This indicates that QS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QSLEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.60%

24.20%

+1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.92%

66.53%

-17.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

103.22%

91.26%

+11.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

85.76%

86.35%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

105.87%

82.30%

+23.57%

Dividends

QS vs. LEU - Dividend Comparison

Neither QS nor LEU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

QS vs. LEU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between QuantumScape Corporation and Centrus Energy Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M202220232024202520260
76.70M
(QS) Total Revenue
(LEU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


QS and LEU have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QS has higher volatility (25.60%) compared to LEU (24.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QS dropped -97.36% vs LEU's -99.98%.

QS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QS and LEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer