PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QRVO vs. MRVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QRVO vs. MRVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRVO achieves a 16.66% return, which is significantly lower than MRVL's 229.54% return. Over the past 10 years, QRVO has underperformed MRVL with an annualized return of 6.12%, while MRVL has yielded a comparatively higher 40.68% annualized return.


QRVO

1D
0.95%
1M
7.74%
YTD
16.66%
6M
11.95%
1Y
20.58%
3Y*
-1.41%
5Y*
-11.67%
10Y*
6.12%

MRVL

1D
-0.36%
1M
57.18%
YTD
229.54%
6M
231.70%
1Y
302.72%
3Y*
64.86%
5Y*
40.49%
10Y*
40.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QRVO vs. MRVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QRVO
Qorvo, Inc.
16.66%20.85%-37.90%24.24%-42.04%-5.94%43.05%91.39%-8.81%26.30%
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
229.54%-22.82%83.79%63.68%-57.48%84.62%80.25%65.74%-23.62%56.89%

Correlation

The correlation between QRVO and MRVL is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.58

The correlation between QRVO and MRVL shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QRVO:

$9.13B

MRVL:

$249.86B

EPS

QRVO:

$3.63

MRVL:

$2.90

PE Ratio

QRVO:

27.19

MRVL:

96.58

PEG Ratio

QRVO:

0.25

MRVL:

0.18

PS Ratio

QRVO:

2.51

MRVL:

27.99

PB Ratio

QRVO:

2.73

MRVL:

13.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

QRVO:

$3.68B

MRVL:

$8.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

QRVO:

$1.69B

MRVL:

$4.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

QRVO:

$659.34M

MRVL:

$4.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QRVO vs. MRVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRVO
QRVO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
QRVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRVO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
QRVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRVO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

MRVL
MRVL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
MRVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRVL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
MRVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRVL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRVO vs. MRVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QRVOMRVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.55

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

11.57

-10.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.84

26.42

-24.57

QRVO vs. MRVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRVO Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the MRVL Sharpe Ratio of 4.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRVO and MRVL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QRVO vs. MRVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRVO drawdown since its inception was -74.54%, smaller than the maximum MRVL drawdown of -91.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRVO and MRVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QRVOMRVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.54%

-91.60%

+17.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.97%

-26.36%

+4.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.68%

-60.79%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.03%

-61.88%

-12.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.54%

-61.88%

-12.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.59%

-11.61%

-38.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.90%

-46.74%

+14.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.21%

11.52%

-0.31%

Volatility

QRVO vs. MRVL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO) is 14.93%, while Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a volatility of 40.61%. This indicates that QRVO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QRVOMRVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.93%

40.61%

-25.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.52%

55.42%

-28.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.68%

70.94%

-36.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.18%

61.82%

-19.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.04%

51.94%

-9.90%

Dividends

QRVO vs. MRVL - Dividend Comparison

QRVO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MRVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
0.09%0.28%0.22%0.40%0.65%0.21%0.50%0.90%1.48%1.12%1.73%2.72%
QRVO
Qorvo, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

QRVO vs. MRVL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Qorvo, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
808.28M
2.42B
(QRVO) Total Revenue
(MRVL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

QRVO vs. MRVL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Qorvo, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
48.9%
52.2%
Portfolio components
QRVO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Qorvo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 395.02M and revenue of 808.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.9%.

MRVL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.

QRVO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Qorvo, Inc. reported an operating income of 31.51M and revenue of 808.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.9%.

MRVL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

QRVO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Qorvo, Inc. reported a net income of 29.73M and revenue of 808.28M, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.

MRVL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


QRVO and MRVL have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRVL has higher volatility (40.61%) compared to QRVO (14.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRVO dropped -74.54% vs MRVL's -91.60%.

MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.30 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QRVO and MRVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer