QRVLX vs. QRSVX
Compare and contrast key facts about FPA Queens Road Value Fund (QRVLX) and FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX).
QRVLX is managed by FPA. It was launched on Jun 13, 2002. QRSVX is a passively managed fund by FPA that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Value. It was launched on Jun 13, 2002.
Performance
QRVLX vs. QRSVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QRVLX vs. QRSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QRVLX FPA Queens Road Value Fund | -2.87% | 6.08% | 18.91% | 16.09% | -8.85% | 27.50% | 2.17% |
QRSVX FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class | 6.07% | 13.37% | 10.72% | 16.04% | -9.14% | 23.16% | 2.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QRVLX achieves a -2.87% return, which is significantly lower than QRSVX's 6.07% return.
QRVLX
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- -4.76%
- YTD
- -2.87%
- 6M
- -6.35%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 8.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.55%
QRSVX
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- -4.48%
- YTD
- 6.07%
- 6M
- 5.67%
- 1Y
- 22.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.33%
- 5Y*
- 8.64%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QRVLX vs. QRSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QRVLX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than QRSVX's 0.94% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QRVLX vs. QRSVX — Risk / Return Rank
QRVLX
QRSVX
QRVLX vs. QRSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FPA Queens Road Value Fund (QRVLX) and FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QRVLX | QRSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.33 | 1.20 | -0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.59 | 1.83 | -1.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.25 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 1.82 | -1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.89 | 7.65 | -5.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QRVLX | QRSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 1.20 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.50 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.65 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between QRVLX and QRSVX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QRVLX vs. QRSVX - Dividend Comparison
QRVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than QRSVX's 4.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QRVLX FPA Queens Road Value Fund | 2.90% | 2.81% | 3.64% | 2.95% | 2.77% | 16.71% | 6.49% | 3.40% | 6.82% | 3.99% | 5.48% | 3.12% |
QRSVX FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class | 4.19% | 4.45% | 4.86% | 2.56% | 2.07% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
QRVLX vs. QRSVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QRVLX drawdown since its inception was -51.40%, which is greater than QRSVX's maximum drawdown of -20.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRVLX and QRSVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QRVLX | QRSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.40% | -20.59% | -30.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -12.93% | +3.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.70% | -20.59% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.48% | -5.01% | -2.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.62% | -5.03% | -1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 3.08% | +0.23% |
Volatility
QRVLX vs. QRSVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FPA Queens Road Value Fund (QRVLX) is 4.33%, while FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that QRVLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QRSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QRVLX | QRSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 4.86% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.20% | 10.94% | -1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.49% | 19.52% | -3.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 17.46% | -2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 17.55% | -0.42% |