PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QRSVX vs. VSMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QRSVX vs. VSMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRSVX achieves a 24.66% return, which is significantly higher than VSMVX's 15.25% return.


QRSVX

1D
-0.28%
1M
6.19%
YTD
24.66%
6M
23.12%
1Y
37.90%
3Y*
21.48%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*

VSMVX

1D
-1.15%
1M
1.16%
YTD
15.25%
6M
15.26%
1Y
37.71%
3Y*
14.11%
5Y*
5.71%
10Y*
10.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QRSVX vs. VSMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QRSVX
FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class
24.66%13.37%10.72%16.04%-9.14%23.16%2.50%
VSMVX
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
15.25%6.38%7.53%14.85%-11.12%30.85%3.13%

Correlation

The correlation between QRSVX and VSMVX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2020

0.93

The correlation between QRSVX and VSMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QRSVX vs. VSMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRSVX
QRSVX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
QRSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
QRSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

VSMVX
VSMVX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VSMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRSVX vs. VSMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QRSVXVSMVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.35

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.75

4.02

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.81

13.23

+3.58

QRSVX vs. VSMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRSVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the VSMVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRSVX and VSMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QRSVXVSMVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.05

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.26

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.50

+0.33

Drawdowns

QRSVX vs. VSMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRSVX drawdown since its inception was -20.59%, smaller than the maximum VSMVX drawdown of -47.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRSVX and VSMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QRSVXVSMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.59%

-47.61%

+27.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.93%

-9.33%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.91%

-28.81%

+9.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.59%

-28.81%

+8.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-1.15%

+0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.89%

-7.64%

+2.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

2.83%

-0.60%

Volatility

QRSVX vs. VSMVX - Volatility Comparison

FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSMVX) have volatilities of 4.50% and 4.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QRSVXVSMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

4.44%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

11.58%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.17%

18.34%

-3.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.48%

22.02%

-4.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

24.13%

-6.64%

QRSVX vs. VSMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRSVX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than VSMVX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

QRSVX vs. VSMVX - Dividend Comparison

QRSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than VSMVX's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QRSVX
FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class
3.57%4.45%4.86%2.56%2.07%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VSMVX
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.65%1.45%1.85%1.92%1.88%1.66%1.46%1.65%1.89%1.55%1.26%1.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, QRSVX and VSMVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QRSVX has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to VSMVX (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRSVX dropped -20.59% vs VSMVX's -47.61%.

QRSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QRSVX and VSMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer