QRSVX vs. PRVIX
Compare and contrast key facts about FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I (PRVIX).
QRSVX is a passively managed fund by FPA that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Value. It was launched on Jun 13, 2002. PRVIX is a passively managed fund by T. Rowe Price that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Value Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2015. Both QRSVX and PRVIX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QRSVX vs. PRVIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QRSVX vs. PRVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QRSVX FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class | 6.07% | 13.37% | 10.72% | 16.04% | -9.14% | 23.16% | 2.50% |
PRVIX T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I | 3.80% | 21.38% | 10.96% | 12.46% | -18.42% | 25.60% | 3.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QRSVX achieves a 6.07% return, which is significantly higher than PRVIX's 3.80% return.
QRSVX
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- -4.48%
- YTD
- 6.07%
- 6M
- 5.67%
- 1Y
- 22.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.33%
- 5Y*
- 8.64%
- 10Y*
- —
PRVIX
- 1D
- 2.77%
- 1M
- -5.04%
- YTD
- 3.80%
- 6M
- 18.59%
- 1Y
- 33.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.09%
- 10Y*
- 11.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QRSVX vs. PRVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QRSVX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than PRVIX's 0.66% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QRSVX vs. PRVIX — Risk / Return Rank
QRSVX
PRVIX
QRSVX vs. PRVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I (PRVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QRSVX | PRVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 1.45 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.83 | 2.28 | -0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.31 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 2.06 | -0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.65 | 8.59 | -0.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QRSVX | PRVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 1.45 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.35 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.51 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between QRSVX and PRVIX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QRSVX vs. PRVIX - Dividend Comparison
QRSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, less than PRVIX's 22.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QRSVX FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class | 4.19% | 4.45% | 4.86% | 2.56% | 2.07% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRVIX T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I | 22.27% | 23.11% | 9.96% | 3.40% | 5.54% | 7.15% | 2.12% | 4.72% | 9.61% | 3.79% | 3.88% | 22.61% |
Drawdowns
QRSVX vs. PRVIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QRSVX drawdown since its inception was -20.59%, smaller than the maximum PRVIX drawdown of -40.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRSVX and PRVIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QRSVX | PRVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.59% | -40.95% | +20.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.93% | -14.06% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.59% | -28.00% | +7.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.01% | -5.60% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.03% | -8.44% | +3.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 3.67% | -0.59% |
Volatility
QRSVX vs. PRVIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX) is 4.86%, while T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I (PRVIX) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that QRSVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QRSVX | PRVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 6.73% | -1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.94% | 16.15% | -5.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.52% | 23.96% | -4.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 20.47% | -3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 21.30% | -3.75% |