QRSVX vs. HWSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX).
QRSVX is a passively managed fund by FPA that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Value. It was launched on Jun 13, 2002. HWSIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Sep 20, 1985.
Performance
QRSVX vs. HWSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QRSVX vs. HWSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QRSVX FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class | 6.07% | 13.37% | 10.72% | 16.04% | -9.14% | 23.16% | 2.50% |
HWSIX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund | 9.06% | 1.60% | 5.00% | 18.85% | 2.97% | 35.54% | 3.45% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QRSVX achieves a 6.07% return, which is significantly lower than HWSIX's 9.06% return.
QRSVX
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- -4.48%
- YTD
- 6.07%
- 6M
- 5.67%
- 1Y
- 22.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.33%
- 5Y*
- 8.64%
- 10Y*
- —
HWSIX
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 9.06%
- 6M
- 7.50%
- 1Y
- 18.87%
- 3Y*
- 10.40%
- 5Y*
- 9.25%
- 10Y*
- 10.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QRSVX vs. HWSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QRSVX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than HWSIX's 1.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QRSVX vs. HWSIX — Risk / Return Rank
QRSVX
HWSIX
QRSVX vs. HWSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QRSVX | HWSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 0.79 | +0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.83 | 1.24 | +0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.18 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 1.18 | +0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.65 | 4.41 | +3.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QRSVX | HWSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 0.79 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.43 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.45 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between QRSVX and HWSIX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QRSVX vs. HWSIX - Dividend Comparison
QRSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than HWSIX's 0.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QRSVX FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class | 4.19% | 4.45% | 4.86% | 2.56% | 2.07% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HWSIX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund | 0.92% | 1.01% | 8.35% | 1.90% | 13.44% | 0.36% | 0.80% | 4.89% | 9.84% | 5.07% | 0.41% | 11.78% |
Drawdowns
QRSVX vs. HWSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QRSVX drawdown since its inception was -20.59%, smaller than the maximum HWSIX drawdown of -72.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRSVX and HWSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QRSVX | HWSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.59% | -72.00% | +51.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.93% | -16.44% | +3.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.59% | -26.92% | +6.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.01% | -1.06% | -3.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.03% | -12.12% | +7.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 4.42% | -1.34% |
Volatility
QRSVX vs. HWSIX - Volatility Comparison
FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX) at 4.45%. This indicates that QRSVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QRSVX | HWSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 4.45% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.94% | 12.99% | -2.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.52% | 23.98% | -4.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 21.71% | -4.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 24.67% | -7.12% |