PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QRPNX vs. TMSRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QRPNX vs. TMSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class N (QRPNX) and T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRPNX achieves a 18.84% return, which is significantly higher than TMSRX's 0.41% return.


QRPNX

1D
-0.18%
1M
3.31%
YTD
18.84%
6M
21.02%
1Y
34.97%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
19.27%
10Y*

TMSRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.72%
1Y
3.60%
3Y*
4.02%
5Y*
0.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QRPNX vs. TMSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QRPNX
AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class N
18.84%23.09%18.64%6.94%24.83%14.04%-21.20%-3.25%-4.58%
TMSRX
T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund
0.41%2.95%5.36%5.09%-4.69%-2.08%13.21%7.59%-2.16%

Correlation

The correlation between QRPNX and TMSRX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2018

0.02

The correlation between QRPNX and TMSRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.13 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QRPNX vs. TMSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRPNX
QRPNX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
QRPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
QRPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

TMSRX
TMSRX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
TMSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TMSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRPNX vs. TMSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class N (QRPNX) and T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QRPNXTMSRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.66

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.16

4.36

+5.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

29.31

17.80

+11.51

QRPNX vs. TMSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRPNX Sharpe Ratio is 3.89, which is higher than the TMSRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRPNX and TMSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QRPNXTMSRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.89

2.13

+1.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.65

0.36

+1.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.83

-0.01

Drawdowns

QRPNX vs. TMSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRPNX drawdown since its inception was -28.78%, which is greater than TMSRX's maximum drawdown of -10.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRPNX and TMSRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QRPNXTMSRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.78%

-10.67%

-18.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.51%

-0.83%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.22%

-2.79%

-8.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.22%

-10.59%

-0.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.16%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-2.73%

-5.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

0.20%

+1.02%

Volatility

QRPNX vs. TMSRX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class N (QRPNX) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX) at 0.00%. This indicates that QRPNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QRPNXTMSRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

0.00%

+2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.75%

1.01%

+5.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.20%

1.70%

+7.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.76%

2.76%

+9.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.32%

3.28%

+7.04%

QRPNX vs. TMSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRPNX has a 5.29% expense ratio, which is higher than TMSRX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

QRPNX vs. TMSRX - Dividend Comparison

QRPNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than TMSRX's 9.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QRPNX
AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class N
0.96%1.14%2.04%4.33%0.00%3.84%1.98%0.57%0.07%
TMSRX
T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund
9.49%7.59%6.72%5.95%2.29%2.88%3.35%3.00%3.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


QRPNX and TMSRX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QRPNX has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to TMSRX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRPNX dropped -28.78% vs TMSRX's -10.67%.

QRPNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.89 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QRPNX and TMSRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer