PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQXT vs. FTQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQXT vs. FTQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQXT achieves a -0.56% return, which is significantly lower than FTQI's 13.47% return. Over the past 10 years, QQXT has outperformed FTQI with an annualized return of 9.97%, while FTQI has yielded a comparatively lower 7.67% annualized return.


QQXT

1D
-0.85%
1M
-0.01%
6M
-1.70%
YTD
-0.56%
1Y
0.08%
3Y*
5.66%
5Y*
3.64%
10Y*
9.97%

FTQI

1D
0.45%
1M
2.57%
6M
12.18%
YTD
13.47%
1Y
27.46%
3Y*
16.95%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
7.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQXT vs. FTQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQXT
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund
-0.56%8.02%6.71%16.81%-13.09%12.02%36.85%28.02%-5.74%20.69%
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
13.47%12.68%18.30%23.63%-8.77%10.46%-6.54%13.98%-9.78%12.47%

Correlation

The correlation between QQXT and FTQI is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2014

0.54

The correlation between QQXT and FTQI shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQXT vs. FTQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQXT
FTQI

Industrials

23.2%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

16.1%
10.5%

Healthcare

16.1%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

14.3%
6.2%

Communication Services

7.1%
11.8%

Technology

7.1%
49.4%

Utilities

7.1%
1.5%

Energy

3.6%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.4%

Financial Services

1.8%
5.5%

Real Estate

1.4%
1.3%

Industrials

QQXT
23.2%
FTQI
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

QQXT
16.1%
FTQI
10.5%

Healthcare

QQXT
16.1%
FTQI
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

QQXT
14.3%
FTQI
6.2%

Communication Services

QQXT
7.1%
FTQI
11.8%

Technology

QQXT
7.1%
FTQI
49.4%

Utilities

QQXT
7.1%
FTQI
1.5%

Energy

QQXT
3.6%
FTQI
2.3%

Basic Materials

QQXT
1.8%
FTQI
1.4%

Financial Services

QQXT
1.8%
FTQI
5.5%

Real Estate

QQXT
1.4%
FTQI
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQXT vs. FTQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQXT
QQXT Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
QQXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQXT Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
QQXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQXT Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

FTQI
FTQI Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FTQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTQI Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FTQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTQI Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQXT vs. FTQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQXTFTQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.48

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

4.42

-4.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.02

20.95

-20.92

QQXT vs. FTQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQXT Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the FTQI Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQXT and FTQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQXT vs. FTQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQXT drawdown since its inception was -57.45%, which is greater than FTQI's maximum drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQXT and FTQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQXTFTQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.45%

-19.42%

-38.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-6.24%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.92%

-19.42%

+4.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.74%

-19.42%

-5.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.40%

-19.42%

-10.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.01%

-0.22%

-4.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.09%

-3.73%

-4.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

1.31%

+2.31%

Volatility

QQXT vs. FTQI - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) at 2.91%. This indicates that QQXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQXTFTQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

2.91%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.18%

8.79%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.00%

10.84%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.30%

14.82%

+1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.45%

12.99%

+4.46%

QQXT vs. FTQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQXT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FTQI's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQXT vs. FTQI - Dividend Comparison

QQXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than FTQI's 10.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
10.85%11.46%11.66%11.49%9.85%3.05%3.27%2.95%3.27%2.74%3.02%3.54%
QQXT
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund
1.25%1.20%0.98%1.10%0.92%0.35%0.28%0.35%0.38%0.32%0.31%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQXT and FTQI have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQXT has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to FTQI (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQXT dropped -57.45% vs FTQI's -19.42%.

On 10-year performance, QQXT leads with 9.97% vs 7.67% for FTQI. On fees, QQXT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FTQI has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQXT has performed better with a 9.97% return vs 7.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQXT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FTQI.

FTQI has the higher dividend yield at 10.85%, compared with 1.25% for QQXT.

QQXT tracks NASDAQ-100 Ex-Tech Sector Index, while FTQI tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QQXT and 0.75% for FTQI.

FTQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQXT and FTQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer