QQXL vs. ISCMF
QQXL (ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQXL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by ProShares, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. QQXL is actively managed, while ISCMF is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. QQXL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.
Performance
QQXL vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQXL achieves a 29.93% return, which is significantly higher than ISCMF's 22.87% return.
QQXL
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -7.57%
- YTD
- 29.93%
- 6M
- 25.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 22.87%
- 1Y
- 31.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQXL vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQXL ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30 | 29.93% | 9.00% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 22.87% | 12.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQXL and ISCMF is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQXL vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
QQXL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ISCMF
QQXL vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30 (QQXL) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQXL | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.53 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.64 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQXL vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQXL drawdown since its inception was -27.34%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQXL and ISCMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQXL | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.34% | -25.42% | -1.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.07% | -5.26% | -4.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.81% | -13.33% | +6.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.69% | — |
Volatility
QQXL vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQXL | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.52% | 17.84% | +22.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.52% | 14.27% | +26.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.52% | 14.27% | +26.25% |
QQXL vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQXL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQXL vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
QQXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQXL ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30 | 0.78% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQXL and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QQXL.
QQXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.
QQXL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QQXL and 0.19% for ISCMF.
Find the right allocation for QQXL and ISCMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer