QQUP vs. XTJL
QQUP (ProShares Ultra Top QQQ) and XTJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. QQUP is passively managed, while XTJL is actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQUP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTJL.
Performance
QQUP vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQUP achieves a 14.50% return, which is significantly higher than XTJL's 5.36% return.
QQUP
- 1D
- -3.99%
- 1M
- 7.57%
- YTD
- 14.50%
- 6M
- 8.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTJL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 6.38%
- 1Y
- 15.64%
- 3Y*
- 14.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQUP vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQUP ProShares Ultra Top QQQ | 14.50% | 44.45% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 5.36% | 8.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQUP and XTJL is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQUP vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank
QQUP
XTJL
QQUP vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQUP | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.77 | 0.65 | +1.13 |
Drawdowns
QQUP vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQUP drawdown since its inception was -37.67%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQUP and XTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQUP | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.67% | -23.24% | -14.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.42% | 0.00% | -6.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -4.04% | -5.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.90% | — |
Volatility
QQUP vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQUP | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.52% | 7.43% | +31.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.52% | 15.22% | +23.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.52% | 15.22% | +23.30% |
QQUP vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQUP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQUP vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison
QQUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, while XTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QQUP ProShares Ultra Top QQQ | 0.42% | 0.29% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQUP and XTJL have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QQUP.
QQUP has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.00% for XTJL.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QQUP and 0.79% for XTJL.
Find the right allocation for QQUP and XTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer