PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQUP vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQUP vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQUP achieves a 14.50% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 30.35% return.


QQUP

1D
-3.99%
1M
7.57%
YTD
14.50%
6M
8.63%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPMO

1D
0.50%
1M
15.36%
YTD
30.35%
6M
30.51%
1Y
46.00%
3Y*
43.04%
5Y*
24.29%
10Y*
20.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQUP vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QQUP
ProShares Ultra Top QQQ
14.50%44.45%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
30.35%11.95%

Correlation

The correlation between QQUP and SPMO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025

0.78

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQUP vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQUP

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQUP vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QQUP vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQUPSPMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.77

1.01

+0.76

Drawdowns

QQUP vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQUP drawdown since its inception was -37.67%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQUP and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQUPSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.67%

-30.95%

-6.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.42%

0.00%

-6.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-4.60%

-4.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

Volatility

QQUP vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQUPSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.52%

17.64%

+20.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.52%

19.30%

+19.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.52%

20.31%

+18.21%

QQUP vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQUP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQUP vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

QQUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than SPMO's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQUP
ProShares Ultra Top QQQ
0.42%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.65%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQUP and SPMO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QQUP.

SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.42% for QQUP.

QQUP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. QQUP tracks Nasdaq-100 Mega Index (200%), while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QQUP and 0.13% for SPMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQUP and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer