QQUP vs. SPMO
QQUP (ProShares Ultra Top QQQ) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQUP is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Mega Index (200%), while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQUP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
QQUP vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQUP achieves a 14.50% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 30.35% return.
QQUP
- 1D
- -3.99%
- 1M
- 7.57%
- YTD
- 14.50%
- 6M
- 8.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 30.35%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
QQUP vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQUP ProShares Ultra Top QQQ | 14.50% | 44.45% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 30.35% | 11.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQUP and SPMO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQUP vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
QQUP
SPMO
QQUP vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQUP | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.77 | 1.01 | +0.76 |
Drawdowns
QQUP vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQUP drawdown since its inception was -37.67%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQUP and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQUP | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.67% | -30.95% | -6.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.42% | 0.00% | -6.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -4.60% | -4.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.26% | — |
Volatility
QQUP vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQUP | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.52% | 17.64% | +20.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.52% | 19.30% | +19.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.52% | 20.31% | +18.21% |
QQUP vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQUP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQUP vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
QQUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than SPMO's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQUP ProShares Ultra Top QQQ | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQUP and SPMO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QQUP.
SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.42% for QQUP.
QQUP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. QQUP tracks Nasdaq-100 Mega Index (200%), while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QQUP and 0.13% for SPMO.
Find the right allocation for QQUP and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer