QQUP vs. MAGS
QQUP (ProShares Ultra Top QQQ) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQUP is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Mega Index (200%), while MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. QQUP is passively managed, while MAGS is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQUP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for MAGS.
Performance
QQUP vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQUP achieves a 14.50% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's 3.73% return.
QQUP
- 1D
- -3.99%
- 1M
- 7.57%
- YTD
- 14.50%
- 6M
- 8.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGS
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 3.73%
- 6M
- 3.62%
- 1Y
- 31.34%
- 3Y*
- 33.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQUP vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQUP ProShares Ultra Top QQQ | 14.50% | 44.45% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 3.73% | 25.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQUP and MAGS is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQUP vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
QQUP
MAGS
QQUP vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQUP | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.77 | 1.55 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
QQUP vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQUP drawdown since its inception was -37.67%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQUP and MAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQUP | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.67% | -29.91% | -7.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.42% | -3.55% | -2.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -4.70% | -4.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.37% | — |
Volatility
QQUP vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQUP | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.31% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.52% | 20.08% | +18.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.52% | 25.94% | +12.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.52% | 25.94% | +12.58% |
QQUP vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQUP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQUP vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
QQUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than MAGS's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.43% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% |
QQUP ProShares Ultra Top QQQ | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQUP and MAGS have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QQUP.
MAGS has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.42% for QQUP.
QQUP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MAGS is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QQUP and 0.29% for MAGS.
Find the right allocation for QQUP and MAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer