QQUP vs. COIG
QQUP (ProShares Ultra Top QQQ) and COIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. QQUP is passively managed, while COIG is actively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQUP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COIG.
Performance
QQUP vs. COIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQUP achieves a 14.50% return, which is significantly higher than COIG's -61.85% return.
QQUP
- 1D
- -3.99%
- 1M
- 7.57%
- YTD
- 14.50%
- 6M
- 8.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COIG
- 1D
- -11.21%
- 1M
- -37.91%
- YTD
- -61.85%
- 6M
- -75.19%
- 1Y
- -79.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQUP vs. COIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQUP ProShares Ultra Top QQQ | 14.50% | 44.45% |
COIG Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF | -61.85% | -36.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQUP and COIG is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQUP vs. COIG — Risk / Return Rank
QQUP
COIG
QQUP vs. COIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQUP | COIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.77 | -0.40 | +2.17 |
Drawdowns
QQUP vs. COIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQUP drawdown since its inception was -37.67%, smaller than the maximum COIG drawdown of -92.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQUP and COIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQUP | COIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.67% | -92.06% | +54.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -92.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.42% | -91.42% | +85.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -51.70% | +42.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 65.88% | — |
Volatility
QQUP vs. COIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQUP | COIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 37.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 100.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.52% | 139.35% | -100.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.52% | 146.45% | -107.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.52% | 146.45% | -107.93% |
QQUP vs. COIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQUP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than COIG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQUP vs. COIG - Dividend Comparison
QQUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, while COIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
COIG Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQUP ProShares Ultra Top QQQ | 0.42% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQUP and COIG have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QQUP.
QQUP has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.00% for COIG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QQUP and 0.75% for COIG.
Find the right allocation for QQUP and COIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer