PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQY vs. QQQT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQY vs. QQQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QQQY having a 18.85% return and QQQT slightly higher at 19.12%.


QQQY

1D
-0.19%
1M
7.95%
YTD
18.85%
6M
18.67%
1Y
35.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQT

1D
-0.28%
1M
8.44%
YTD
19.12%
6M
17.27%
1Y
33.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQY vs. QQQT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
18.85%14.96%-1.57%
QQQT
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF
19.12%14.04%4.51%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQY and QQQT is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2024

0.89

The correlation between QQQY and QQQT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQY vs. QQQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQT
QQQT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QQQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQT Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQT Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQY vs. QQQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQYQQQTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.43

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

2.67

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.65

9.36

+4.29

QQQY vs. QQQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQY Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the QQQT Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQY and QQQT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQYQQQTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.32

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

0.98

+0.27

Drawdowns

QQQY vs. QQQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQY drawdown since its inception was -19.05%, smaller than the maximum QQQT drawdown of -22.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY and QQQT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQYQQQTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.05%

-22.50%

+3.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.14%

-12.73%

+1.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.57%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.91%

-4.00%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

3.62%

-1.01%

Volatility

QQQY vs. QQQT - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) have volatilities of 4.14% and 4.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQYQQQTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

4.05%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

11.19%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.66%

14.62%

-0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.74%

20.23%

-5.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.74%

20.23%

-5.49%

QQQY vs. QQQT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQT's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQY vs. QQQT - Dividend Comparison

QQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.18%, more than QQQT's 19.21% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
QQQT
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF
19.21%21.27%10.35%0.00%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
35.18%45.34%83.34%20.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, QQQY and QQQT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQQY has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to QQQT (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQY dropped -19.05% vs QQQT's -22.50%.

On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 35.59% vs 33.79% for QQQT. On fees, QQQY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 35.59% return vs 33.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for QQQT.

QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 35.18%, compared with 19.21% for QQQT.

Their fees differ too: 0.99% for QQQY and 1.05% for QQQT.

QQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQY and QQQT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer