QQQY vs. MST
QQQY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF) and MST (Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance, while MST is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQQY returned 36.38% vs -92.85% for MST. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQY charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for MST.
Performance
QQQY vs. MST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQY achieves a 19.07% return, which is significantly higher than MST's -46.90% return.
QQQY
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 9.64%
- YTD
- 19.07%
- 6M
- 19.11%
- 1Y
- 36.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MST
- 1D
- -14.62%
- 1M
- -51.85%
- YTD
- -46.90%
- 6M
- -62.90%
- 1Y
- -92.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQY vs. MST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF | 19.07% | 22.66% |
MST Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF | -46.90% | -87.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQY and MST is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQY vs. MST — Risk / Return Rank
QQQY
MST
QQQY vs. MST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) and Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF (MST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQY | MST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 0.78 | +0.71 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | -0.98 | +4.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.95 | -1.28 | +15.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQY | MST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | -0.74 | +3.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | -0.74 | +2.00 |
Drawdowns
QQQY vs. MST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQY drawdown since its inception was -19.05%, smaller than the maximum MST drawdown of -94.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY and MST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQY | MST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.05% | -94.99% | +75.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.14% | -94.99% | +83.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -94.34% | +93.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.91% | -62.22% | +59.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 72.32% | -69.71% |
Volatility
QQQY vs. MST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) is 4.21%, while Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF (MST) has a volatility of 35.73%. This indicates that QQQY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQY | MST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 35.73% | -31.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.30% | 101.54% | -90.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.67% | 126.60% | -112.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 123.87% | -109.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 123.87% | -109.12% |
QQQY vs. MST - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MST's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQY vs. MST - Dividend Comparison
QQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.34%, less than MST's 891.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MST Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF | 891.75% | 381.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF | 34.34% | 45.34% | 83.34% | 20.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQY and MST have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MST has higher volatility (35.73%) compared to QQQY (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQY dropped -19.05% vs MST's -94.99%.
On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 36.38% vs -92.85% for MST. On fees, QQQY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, QQQY has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 36.38% return vs -92.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for MST.
MST has the higher dividend yield at 891.75%, compared with 34.34% for QQQY.
QQQY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while MST is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for QQQY and 1.31% for MST.
QQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQY and MST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer