QQQY vs. COIW
QQQY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF) and COIW (COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance, while COIW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQQY returned 30.60% vs -46.63% for COIW. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
QQQY vs. COIW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQY achieves a 14.65% return, which is significantly higher than COIW's -35.32% return.
QQQY
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 14.65%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 30.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COIW
- 1D
- 7.79%
- 1M
- -23.46%
- YTD
- -35.32%
- 6M
- -48.91%
- 1Y
- -46.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQY vs. COIW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF | 14.65% | 10.91% |
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF | -35.32% | -25.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQY and COIW is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025 | 0.58 |
The correlation between QQQY and COIW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQY vs. COIW — Risk / Return Rank
QQQY
COIW
QQQY vs. COIW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) and COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQY | COIW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 0.95 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | -0.63 | +3.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.59 | -0.99 | +12.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQY | COIW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | -0.55 | +2.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | -0.46 | +1.58 |
Drawdowns
QQQY vs. COIW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQY drawdown since its inception was -19.05%, smaller than the maximum COIW drawdown of -74.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY and COIW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQY | COIW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.05% | -74.55% | +55.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.14% | -74.55% | +63.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.06% | -70.71% | +66.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.91% | -38.03% | +35.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 47.34% | -44.69% |
Volatility
QQQY vs. COIW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) is 6.53%, while COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) has a volatility of 25.57%. This indicates that QQQY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COIW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQY | COIW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.53% | 25.57% | -19.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.41% | 62.78% | -50.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.55% | 85.48% | -70.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 91.27% | -76.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 91.27% | -76.24% |
QQQY vs. COIW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QQQY and COIW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
QQQY vs. COIW - Dividend Comparison
QQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.66%, less than COIW's 235.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF | 235.93% | 120.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF | 35.66% | 45.34% | 83.34% | 20.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQY and COIW have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COIW has higher volatility (25.57%) compared to QQQY (6.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQY dropped -19.05% vs COIW's -74.55%.
On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 30.60% vs -46.63% for COIW. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, QQQY has been the lower-risk option at 6.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 30.60% return vs -46.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQY and COIW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
COIW has the higher dividend yield at 235.93%, compared with 35.66% for QQQY.
QQQY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while COIW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Roundhill.
QQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQY and COIW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer