PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQY.TO vs. QQQQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQY.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO) and Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQQQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQY.TO achieves a 16.30% return, which is significantly lower than QQQQ.TO's 19.55% return.


QQQY.TO

1D
-0.20%
1M
-2.01%
6M
16.17%
YTD
16.30%
1Y
34.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQQ.TO

1D
-0.10%
1M
3.94%
6M
15.84%
YTD
19.55%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQY.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QQQY.TO and QQQQ.TO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025

0.60

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQY.TO vs. QQQQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQY.TO
QQQY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
QQQY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQQ.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQY.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO) and Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQY.TOQQQQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.46

QQQY.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQY.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQY.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.27%, which is greater than QQQQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY.TO and QQQQ.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQY.TOQQQQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.27%

-12.27%

-14.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.76%

-3.73%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.03%

-3.16%

-0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

Volatility

QQQY.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQY.TOQQQQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.31%

19.66%

+1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.26%

19.66%

+4.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.26%

19.66%

+4.60%

QQQY.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQY.TO has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQQ.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQY.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQQY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.89%, more than QQQQ.TO's 0.09% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
QQQQ.TO
Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF
0.09%0.11%0.00%0.00%
QQQY.TO
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund
12.89%13.97%15.92%2.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQY.TO and QQQQ.TO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQQ.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for QQQY.TO.

QQQY.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted™ Index, while QQQQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Evolve and Mackenzie. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for QQQY.TO and 0.25% for QQQQ.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQY.TO and QQQQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer