QQQQ.TO vs. QLDY
QQQQ.TO (Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF) and QLDY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QQQQ.TO is passively managed, while QLDY is actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQQ.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for QLDY.
Performance
QQQQ.TO vs. QLDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QQQQ.TO is traded in CAD, while QLDY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QLDY values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QQQQ.TO having a 21.51% return and QLDY slightly lower at 20.80%.
QQQQ.TO
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 13.62%
- YTD
- 21.51%
- 6M
- 18.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLDY
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 13.86%
- YTD
- 20.80%
- 6M
- 16.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQQ.TO vs. QLDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQQQ.TO Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF | 21.51% | 4.84% |
QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF | 20.80% | 0.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQQ.TO and QLDY is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQQ.TO vs. QLDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQQQ.TO) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQQ.TO | QLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.87 | 1.71 | +1.16 |
Drawdowns
QQQQ.TO vs. QLDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.95%, smaller than the maximum QLDY drawdown of -17.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQQ.TO and QLDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQQ.TO | QLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.95% | -17.78% | +5.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.38% | -5.10% | +1.72% |
Volatility
QQQQ.TO vs. QLDY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQQ.TO | QLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.07% | 19.14% | -2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.07% | 19.14% | -2.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.07% | 19.14% | -2.07% |
QQQQ.TO vs. QLDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQQ.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QLDY's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQQ.TO vs. QLDY - Dividend Comparison
QQQQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than QLDY's 21.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF | 21.47% | 9.34% |
QQQQ.TO Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF | 0.09% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQQ.TO and QLDY have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQQ.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for QLDY.
They also come from different issuers: Mackenzie and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QQQQ.TO and 1.04% for QLDY.
Find the right allocation for QQQQ.TO and QLDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer