PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQX vs. GIDHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQX vs. GIDHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GIDHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QQQX having a 12.49% return and GIDHX slightly higher at 12.64%. Over the past 10 years, QQQX has outperformed GIDHX with an annualized return of 13.04%, while GIDHX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.95% annualized return.


QQQX

1D
1.90%
1M
1.83%
6M
15.57%
YTD
12.49%
1Y
25.62%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
13.04%
ALL TIME*
11.09%

GIDHX

1D
0.32%
1M
3.18%
6M
6.51%
YTD
12.64%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
14.62%
5Y*
7.43%
10Y*
6.95%
ALL TIME*
6.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$2.45M$3.62M$3.37M

QQQX vs. GIDHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQX
Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
12.49%14.87%25.61%21.68%-27.39%25.32%15.75%28.83%-11.68%39.19%
GIDHX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund
12.64%28.92%-2.17%16.16%-13.41%9.36%1.20%14.82%-12.96%23.84%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQX and GIDHX is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009

0.59

The correlation between QQQX and GIDHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQX vs. GIDHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQQX
QQQX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QQQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

GIDHX
GIDHX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
GIDHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIDHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIDHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
GIDHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIDHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQQX vs. GIDHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GIDHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQXGIDHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.32

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

2.99

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.98

12.05

-2.08

QQQX vs. GIDHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the GIDHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQX and GIDHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQX vs. GIDHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQX drawdown since its inception was -57.25%, which is greater than GIDHX's maximum drawdown of -36.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQX and GIDHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQXGIDHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.25%

-36.19%

-21.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-8.14%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.80%

-12.88%

-9.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.33%

-28.46%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.96%

-36.19%

+0.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-0.53%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.98%

-8.11%

+0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

2.01%

+0.56%

Volatility

QQQX vs. GIDHX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GIDHX) at 3.69%. This indicates that QQQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIDHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQXGIDHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

3.69%

+1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.01%

11.58%

+2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.44%

13.68%

+2.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.16%

14.86%

+5.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.19%

15.18%

+6.01%

QQQX vs. GIDHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QQQX and GIDHX have an expense ratio of 0.89%.


Dividends

QQQX vs. GIDHX - Dividend Comparison

QQQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.07%, more than GIDHX's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIDHX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund
2.87%2.58%3.27%3.56%0.58%3.09%2.65%3.24%3.42%2.54%3.08%4.13%
QQQX
Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
8.07%7.85%6.73%7.26%9.66%5.85%6.00%6.49%8.40%5.95%7.54%7.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQX and GIDHX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQX has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to GIDHX (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQX dropped -57.25% vs GIDHX's -36.19%.

GIDHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQX and GIDHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer