QQQX.TO vs. HQU.TO
QQQX.TO (Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF) and HQU.TO (BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds from Global X. Over the past year, QQQX.TO returned 43.14% vs 79.57% for HQU.TO. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
QQQX.TO vs. HQU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQX.TO achieves a 22.62% return, which is significantly lower than HQU.TO's 40.64% return.
QQQX.TO
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 11.24%
- YTD
- 22.62%
- 6M
- 19.00%
- 1Y
- 43.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HQU.TO
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 18.42%
- YTD
- 40.64%
- 6M
- 36.03%
- 1Y
- 79.57%
- 3Y*
- 46.76%
- 5Y*
- 22.94%
- 10Y*
- 33.24%
QQQX.TO vs. HQU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQX.TO Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF | 22.62% | 14.55% | 20.80% |
HQU.TO BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF | 40.64% | 26.77% | 20.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQX.TO and HQU.TO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2024 | 0.90 |
The correlation between QQQX.TO and HQU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQX.TO vs. HQU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QQQX.TO
HQU.TO
QQQX.TO vs. HQU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQX.TO) and BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQX.TO | HQU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.40 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 3.13 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.44 | 10.71 | +0.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQX.TO | HQU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 2.54 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.43 | 0.06 | +1.37 |
Drawdowns
QQQX.TO vs. HQU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQX.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.62%, smaller than the maximum HQU.TO drawdown of -95.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQX.TO and HQU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQX.TO | HQU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.62% | -95.76% | +73.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.18% | -25.85% | +13.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -43.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -64.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.47% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -55.28% | +51.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.78% | 7.54% | -3.76% |
Volatility
QQQX.TO vs. HQU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQX.TO) is 4.72%, while BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) has a volatility of 9.23%. This indicates that QQQX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HQU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQX.TO | HQU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 9.23% | -4.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.94% | 24.31% | -12.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.01% | 31.84% | -15.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 44.89% | -24.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 44.87% | -24.15% |
Dividends
QQQX.TO vs. HQU.TO - Dividend Comparison
QQQX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, while HQU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HQU.TO BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQX.TO Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF | 0.29% | 0.35% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, QQQX.TO and HQU.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for QQQX.TO and HQU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer