PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQU vs. XTJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQU vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQU achieves a -5.22% return, which is significantly lower than XTJL's 6.32% return.


QQQU

1D
6.85%
1M
2.17%
6M
-5.40%
YTD
-5.22%
1Y
28.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
43.14%

XTJL

1D
0.76%
1M
0.96%
6M
5.49%
YTD
6.32%
1Y
14.27%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
9.55%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.18M$2.57M$3.73M
$26.11K$26.81K$267.40K

QQQU vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QQQU and XTJL is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.75

The correlation between QQQU and XTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQU vs. XTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQU
XTJL

Technology

42.8%
39.1%

Consumer Cyclical

29.4%
9.9%

Communication Services

27.8%
10.7%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Energy

-

3.1%

Financial Services

-

10.9%

Healthcare

-

8.3%

Industrials

-

7.8%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Technology

QQQU
42.8%
XTJL
39.1%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQU
29.4%
XTJL
9.9%

Communication Services

QQQU
27.8%
XTJL
10.7%

Basic Materials

QQQU

-

XTJL
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

QQQU

-

XTJL
4.5%

Energy

QQQU

-

XTJL
3.1%

Financial Services

QQQU

-

XTJL
10.9%

Healthcare

QQQU

-

XTJL
8.3%

Industrials

QQQU

-

XTJL
7.8%

Real Estate

QQQU

-

XTJL
1.8%

Utilities

QQQU

-

XTJL
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQU vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQQU
QQQU Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
QQQU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQU Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQU Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

XTJL
XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQQU vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQUXTJLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.36

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

2.55

-1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.52

14.07

-12.55

QQQU vs. XTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQU Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the XTJL Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQU and XTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQU vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQU drawdown since its inception was -53.70%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQU and XTJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQUXTJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.70%

-23.24%

-30.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.29%

-5.12%

-31.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.34%

-0.09%

-15.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.50%

-3.92%

-9.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.41%

0.93%

+12.48%

Volatility

QQQU vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) has a higher volatility of 16.52% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 2.90%. This indicates that QQQU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQUXTJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.52%

2.90%

+13.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.79%

6.12%

+28.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.63%

7.79%

+36.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.39%

15.11%

+38.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.39%

15.03%

+38.36%

QQQU vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQU has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQU vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison

QQQU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.07%, while XTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


QQQU and XTJL have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQU has higher volatility (16.52%) compared to XTJL (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQU dropped -53.70% vs XTJL's -23.24%.

On 1-year performance, QQQU leads with 28.43% vs 14.27% for XTJL. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQU has performed better with a 28.43% return vs 14.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for QQQU.

QQQU has the higher dividend yield at 10.07%, compared with 0.00% for XTJL.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for QQQU and 0.79% for XTJL.

XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQU and XTJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer