PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQU vs. TSLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQU vs. TSLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQU achieves a -1.66% return, which is significantly higher than TSLG's -34.66% return.


QQQU

1D
-1.91%
1M
5.66%
6M
-2.38%
YTD
-1.66%
1Y
35.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLG

1D
-6.31%
1M
-8.97%
6M
-33.95%
YTD
-34.66%
1Y
14.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQU vs. TSLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQU
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares
-1.66%32.87%-6.98%
TSLG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
-34.66%-26.70%-14.82%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQU and TSLG is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024

0.76

The correlation between QQQU and TSLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQU vs. TSLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQU
QQQU Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
QQQU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQU Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQU Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLG
TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQU vs. TSLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQUTSLGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.10

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

0.27

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.78

0.53

+2.25

QQQU vs. TSLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQU Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the TSLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQU and TSLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQU vs. TSLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQU drawdown since its inception was -53.70%, smaller than the maximum TSLG drawdown of -82.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQU and TSLG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQUTSLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.70%

-82.86%

+29.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.29%

-54.61%

+18.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.16%

-66.99%

+54.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.44%

-59.00%

+45.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.78%

28.42%

-15.64%

Volatility

QQQU vs. TSLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) is 15.89%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) has a volatility of 35.19%. This indicates that QQQU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQUTSLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.89%

35.19%

-19.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.72%

62.74%

-30.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.37%

89.65%

-47.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.16%

115.68%

-62.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.16%

115.68%

-62.52%

QQQU vs. TSLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQU has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQU vs. TSLG - Dividend Comparison

QQQU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.71%, less than TSLG's 10.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
QQQU
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares
9.71%9.62%2.75%
TSLG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
10.02%6.55%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQU and TSLG have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLG has higher volatility (35.19%) compared to QQQU (15.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQU dropped -53.70% vs TSLG's -82.86%.

On 1-year performance, QQQU leads with 35.42% vs 14.94% for TSLG. On fees, TSLG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, QQQU has been the lower-risk option at 15.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQU has performed better with a 35.42% return vs 14.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for QQQU.

TSLG has the higher dividend yield at 10.02%, compared with 9.71% for QQQU.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for QQQU and 0.75% for TSLG.

QQQU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQU and TSLG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer