PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQU vs. NRGU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQU vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQU vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQU achieves a -22.68% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 139.49% return.


QQQU

1D
2.67%
1M
-10.17%
YTD
-22.68%
6M
-19.92%
1Y
45.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NRGU

1D
-10.75%
1M
24.81%
YTD
139.49%
6M
107.68%
1Y
69.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQU vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQQU vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQU
QQQU Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
QQQU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQU Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQU Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

NRGU
NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQU vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQUNRGUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.82

0.79

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.49

1.48

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.21

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

1.29

+0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.44

2.64

+1.81

QQQU vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQU Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is comparable to the NRGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQU and NRGU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQUNRGUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

0.79

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.61

+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between QQQU and NRGU is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

QQQU vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

QQQU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.41%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

QQQU vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQU drawdown since its inception was -53.70%, smaller than the maximum NRGU drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQU and NRGU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQUNRGUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.70%

-57.50%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.29%

-55.24%

+18.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.64%

-17.40%

-11.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.68%

-25.38%

+11.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.44%

27.12%

-15.68%

Volatility

QQQU vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) is 16.87%, while MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) has a volatility of 23.31%. This indicates that QQQU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQUNRGUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.87%

23.31%

-6.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.03%

50.27%

-19.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.55%

88.18%

-32.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.08%

87.12%

-33.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.08%

87.12%

-33.04%