PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQU vs. MUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQU vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQU achieves a 6.21% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 798.37% return.


QQQU

1D
2.17%
1M
5.86%
YTD
6.21%
6M
4.73%
1Y
62.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MUU

1D
-15.35%
1M
121.05%
YTD
798.37%
6M
1,279.44%
1Y
5,396.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQU vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQU
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares
6.21%32.87%30.75%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
798.37%599.03%-43.09%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQU and MUU is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQU vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQU
QQQU Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
QQQU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQU Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQU Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

MUU
MUU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQU vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQUMUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-39.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.86

-0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

104.05

-102.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.44

352.22

-346.78

QQQU vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQU Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 41.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQU and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQUMUUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

41.32

-39.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

5.91

-4.91

Drawdowns

QQQU vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQU drawdown since its inception was -53.70%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQU and MUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQUMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.70%

-75.07%

+21.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.29%

-52.72%

+16.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.13%

-15.35%

+10.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.33%

-23.42%

+10.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.62%

15.54%

-3.92%

Volatility

QQQU vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) is 9.51%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 56.84%. This indicates that QQQU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQUMUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.51%

56.84%

-47.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.27%

106.70%

-78.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.92%

132.77%

-92.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.96%

134.14%

-81.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.96%

134.14%

-81.18%

QQQU vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQU vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

QQQU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.03%, more than MUU's 0.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
0.54%4.27%0.31%
QQQU
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares
9.03%9.62%2.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQU and MUU have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUU has higher volatility (56.84%) compared to QQQU (9.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQU dropped -53.70% vs MUU's -75.07%.

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 5396.82% vs 62.95% for QQQU. On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.06% per year. On volatility, QQQU has been the lower-risk option at 9.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 5396.82% return vs 62.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MUU is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for QQQU.

QQQU has the higher dividend yield at 9.03%, compared with 0.54% for MUU.

Their fees differ too: 1.07% for QQQU and 1.06% for MUU.

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (41.32 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQU and MUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer