QQQU vs. INTW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QQQU (Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. QQQU is passively managed, while INTW is actively managed. Over the past year, QQQU returned 31.23% vs 1964.55% for INTW. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQU charges 0.98%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.

Performance

QQQU vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQU achieves a -11.91% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 750.22% return.

QQQU

• 1D: -2.93%
• 1M: -17.71%
• YTD: -11.91%
• 6M: -14.75%
• 1Y: 31.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INTW

• 1D: -12.49%
• 1M: 12.21%
• YTD: 750.22%
• 6M: 775.58%
• 1Y: 1,964.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQU vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQQU Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares	-11.91%	35.85%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	750.22%	60.89%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQU and INTW is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025	0.35

QQQU vs. INTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQU	INTW
Technology	43.3%	66.7%
Consumer Cyclical	29.1%	-
Communication Services	27.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

QQQU vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQU

QQQU Risk / Return Rank: 22
QQQU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
QQQU Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
QQQU Omega Ratio Rank: 22
QQQU Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
QQQU Martin Ratio Rank: 22

INTW

INTW Risk / Return Rank: 98
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 94
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQU vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQU	INTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.76	13.25	-12.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	5.13	-3.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.65	-0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.86	40.32	-39.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.58	91.49	-88.91

QQQU vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQU Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the INTW Sharpe Ratio of 13.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQU and INTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQQU vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQU drawdown since its inception was -53.70%, smaller than the maximum INTW drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQU and INTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQU	INTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.70%	-60.58%	+6.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.29%	-49.34%	+13.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.31%	-12.49%	-8.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.35%	-29.66%	+16.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.12%	21.70%	-9.58%

Volatility

QQQU vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) is 14.57%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 55.81%. This indicates that QQQU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQU	INTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.57%	55.81%	-41.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.86%	119.10%	-88.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.29%	150.14%	-108.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.21%	148.88%	-95.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.21%	148.88%	-95.67%

QQQU vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQU has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQU vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

QQQU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.89%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQU Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares	10.89%	9.62%	2.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQU and INTW in my portfolio?

QQQU and INTW have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQU or INTW?

INTW has higher volatility (55.81%) compared to QQQU (14.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQU dropped -53.70% vs INTW's -60.58%.

Which ETF is better, QQQU or INTW?

On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 1964.55% vs 31.23% for QQQU. On fees, QQQU is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, QQQU has been the lower-risk option at 14.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQU or INTW?

Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 1964.55% return vs 31.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQU or INTW?

QQQU is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQU or INTW?

QQQU has the higher dividend yield at 10.89%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.

What is the main difference between QQQU and INTW?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for QQQU and 1.50% for INTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.25 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.