PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQU vs. IFED
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQU vs. IFED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQU achieves a -5.22% return, which is significantly lower than IFED's 10.03% return.


QQQU

1D
6.85%
1M
2.17%
6M
-5.40%
YTD
-5.22%
1Y
28.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
43.14%

IFED

1D
0.00%
1M
13.92%
6M
14.63%
YTD
10.03%
1Y
14.76%
3Y*
18.74%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$159.79K$83.84K$44.71K
$2.18M$2.57M$3.73M

QQQU vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQU
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares
-5.22%32.87%87.67%
IFED
ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN
10.03%15.02%12.63%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQU and IFED is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQU vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQQU
QQQU Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
QQQU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQU Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQU Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

IFED
IFED Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IFED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFED Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFED Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IFED Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFED Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQQU vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQUIFEDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.14

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

0.64

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.52

2.01

-0.49

QQQU vs. IFED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQU Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is comparable to the IFED Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQU and IFED, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQU vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQU drawdown since its inception was -53.70%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQU and IFED.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQUIFEDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.70%

-22.36%

-31.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.29%

-20.18%

-16.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.34%

-7.61%

-7.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.50%

-5.85%

-7.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.41%

6.43%

+6.98%

Volatility

QQQU vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) is 16.52%, while ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) has a volatility of 24.07%. This indicates that QQQU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQUIFEDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.52%

24.07%

-7.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.79%

27.96%

+6.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.63%

29.34%

+15.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.39%

22.56%

+30.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.39%

22.56%

+30.83%

QQQU vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQU has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQU vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison

QQQU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.07%, while IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
IFED
ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQU
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares
10.07%9.62%2.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQU and IFED have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IFED has higher volatility (24.07%) compared to QQQU (16.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQU dropped -53.70% vs IFED's -22.36%.

On 1-year performance, QQQU leads with 28.43% vs 14.76% for IFED. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, QQQU has been the lower-risk option at 16.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQU has performed better with a 28.43% return vs 14.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for QQQU.

QQQU has the higher dividend yield at 10.07%, compared with 0.00% for IFED.

QQQU tracks Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (200%), while IFED tracks IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for QQQU and 0.45% for IFED.

QQQU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQU and IFED

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer