QQQT vs. XMAG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QQQT (Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF) and XMAG (Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQT is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance, while XMAG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index. QQQT is actively managed, while XMAG is passively managed. Over the past year, QQQT returned 34.63% vs 24.62% for XMAG. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQT charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMAG.

Performance

QQQT vs. XMAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) and Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQT achieves a 19.45% return, which is significantly higher than XMAG's 12.73% return.

QQQT

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 9.90%
• YTD: 19.45%
• 6M: 17.66%
• 1Y: 34.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XMAG

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 6.69%
• YTD: 12.73%
• 6M: 13.28%
• 1Y: 24.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQT vs. XMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQQT Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF	19.45%	14.04%	2.67%
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF	12.73%	15.63%	-1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQT and XMAG is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2024	0.75

The correlation between QQQT and XMAG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQT vs. XMAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQT	XMAG
Financial Services	99.8%	17.3%
Technology	54.2%	25.3%
Communication Services	15.5%	3.9%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	6.2%
Consumer Defensive	7.6%	7.3%
Healthcare	4.2%	13.0%
Industrials	2.8%	12.6%
Utilities	1.4%	3.4%
Basic Materials	1.2%	2.5%
Energy	0.6%	5.5%
Real Estate	0.1%	2.9%

Return for Risk

QQQT vs. XMAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQT

QQQT Risk / Return Rank: 64
QQQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
QQQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
QQQT Omega Ratio Rank: 72
QQQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
QQQT Martin Ratio Rank: 55

XMAG

XMAG Risk / Return Rank: 68
XMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
XMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
XMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 63
XMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
XMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQT vs. XMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) and Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQQT	XMAG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.38	2.23	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	3.21	-0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.39	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	3.39	-0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.59	15.15	-5.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQQT vs. XMAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQT Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the XMAG Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQT and XMAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQQT	XMAG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.38	2.23	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.99	1.11	-0.12

Drawdowns

QQQT vs. XMAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQT drawdown since its inception was -22.50%, which is greater than XMAG's maximum drawdown of -16.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQT and XMAG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQT	XMAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.50%	-16.17%	-6.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.73%	-7.29%	-5.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	0.00%	-0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.01%	-2.13%	-1.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.62%	1.63%	+1.99%

Volatility

QQQT vs. XMAG - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) at 2.87%. This indicates that QQQT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQT	XMAG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.04%	2.87%	+1.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.20%	8.65%	+2.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.61%	11.10%	+3.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.24%	15.12%	+5.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.24%	15.12%	+5.12%

QQQT vs. XMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQT has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than XMAG's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQT vs. XMAG - Dividend Comparison

QQQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.16%, more than XMAG's 0.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QQQT Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF	19.16%	21.27%	10.35%
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF	0.46%	0.51%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQT and XMAG in my portfolio?

QQQT and XMAG have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQT or XMAG?

QQQT has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to XMAG (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQT dropped -22.50% vs XMAG's -16.17%.

Which ETF is better, QQQT or XMAG?

On 1-year performance, QQQT leads with 34.63% vs 24.62% for XMAG. On fees, XMAG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XMAG has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQT or XMAG?

Over the 1-year period, QQQT has performed better with a 34.63% return vs 24.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQT or XMAG?

XMAG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for QQQT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQT or XMAG?

QQQT has the higher dividend yield at 19.16%, compared with 0.46% for XMAG.

What is the main difference between QQQT and XMAG?

QQQT is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XMAG is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for QQQT and 0.35% for XMAG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.