QQQT vs. IONX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

QQQT (Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF) and IONX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQT is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance, while IONX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQQT returned 22.78% vs -67.50% for IONX. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QQQT charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for IONX.

Performance

QQQT vs. IONX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF (IONX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQT achieves a 13.07% return, which is significantly higher than IONX's -62.46% return.

QQQT

• 1D: 1.28%
• 1M: -1.76%
• 6M: 11.41%
• YTD: 13.07%
• 1Y: 22.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.98%

IONX

• 1D: 12.99%
• 1M: -43.03%
• 6M: -45.65%
• YTD: -62.46%
• 1Y: -67.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -24.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IONX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF	$27.33M	$27.72M	$85.53M
QQQT Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF	$676.38K	$582.63K	$768.61K

QQQT vs. IONX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQQT Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF	13.07%	24.10%
IONX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF	-62.46%	80.91%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQT and IONX is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2025	0.51

The correlation between QQQT and IONX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQT vs. IONX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQT	IONX
Technology	60.9%	100.0%
Communication Services	13.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	-
Healthcare	3.6%	-
Industrials	2.7%	-
Utilities	1.1%	-
Basic Materials	1.0%	-
Energy	0.5%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QQQT vs. IONX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQQT

QQQT Risk / Return Rank: 49
QQQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
QQQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
QQQT Omega Ratio Rank: 51
QQQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
QQQT Martin Ratio Rank: 48

IONX

IONX Risk / Return Rank: 9
IONX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
IONX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
IONX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
IONX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
IONX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQQT vs. IONX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF (IONX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQT	IONX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	-0.36	+1.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.79	0.49	+1.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.05	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	-0.72	+2.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.57	-0.95	+6.52

QQQT vs. IONX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQT Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the IONX Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQT and IONX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQQT vs. IONX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQT drawdown since its inception was -22.50%, smaller than the maximum IONX drawdown of -94.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQT and IONX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQT	IONX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.50%	-94.05%	+71.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.73%	-94.05%	+81.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.62%	-91.44%	+85.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.02%	-53.79%	+49.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.10%	71.00%	-66.90%

Volatility

QQQT vs. IONX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) is 6.32%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF (IONX) has a volatility of 48.39%. This indicates that QQQT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IONX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQT	IONX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.32%	48.39%	-42.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.03%	136.20%	-121.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.84%	188.86%	-171.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.83%	197.32%	-176.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.83%	197.32%	-176.49%

QQQT vs. IONX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQT has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IONX's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQT vs. IONX - Dividend Comparison

QQQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.79%, more than IONX's 6.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
IONX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF	6.79%	2.55%	0.00%
QQQT Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF	20.79%	21.27%	10.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQT and IONX in my portfolio?

QQQT and IONX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQT or IONX?

IONX has higher volatility (48.39%) compared to QQQT (6.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQT dropped -22.50% vs IONX's -94.05%.

Which ETF is better, QQQT or IONX?

On 1-year performance, QQQT leads with 22.78% vs -67.50% for IONX. On fees, QQQT is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, QQQT has been the lower-risk option at 6.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQT or IONX?

Over the 1-year period, QQQT has performed better with a 22.78% return vs -67.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQT or IONX?

QQQT is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for IONX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQT or IONX?

QQQT has the higher dividend yield at 20.79%, compared with 6.79% for IONX.

What is the main difference between QQQT and IONX?

QQQT is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IONX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for QQQT and 1.31% for IONX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.