QQQT vs. FEPI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QQQT (Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF) and FEPI (REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQT is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance, while FEPI is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQQT returned 34.63% vs 33.15% for FEPI. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQQT charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FEPI.

Performance

QQQT vs. FEPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) and REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQT achieves a 19.45% return, which is significantly higher than FEPI's 10.42% return.

QQQT

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 9.90%
• YTD: 19.45%
• 6M: 17.66%
• 1Y: 34.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FEPI

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 5.91%
• YTD: 10.42%
• 6M: 11.37%
• 1Y: 33.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQT vs. FEPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQQT Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF	19.45%	14.04%	4.51%
FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF	10.42%	18.33%	3.91%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQT and FEPI is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2024	0.89

The correlation between QQQT and FEPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQT vs. FEPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQT	FEPI
Financial Services	99.8%	-
Technology	54.2%	62.1%
Communication Services	15.5%	24.9%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	13.0%
Consumer Defensive	7.6%	-
Healthcare	4.2%	-
Industrials	2.8%	-
Utilities	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	1.2%	-
Energy	0.6%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QQQT vs. FEPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQT

QQQT Risk / Return Rank: 64
QQQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
QQQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
QQQT Omega Ratio Rank: 72
QQQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
QQQT Martin Ratio Rank: 55

FEPI

FEPI Risk / Return Rank: 54
FEPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FEPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FEPI Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FEPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
FEPI Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQT vs. FEPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) and REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQQT	FEPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.38	2.02	+0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	2.67	+0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.36	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	2.58	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.59	8.66	+0.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQQT vs. FEPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQT Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the FEPI Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQT and FEPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQQT	FEPI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.38	2.02	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.99	1.16	-0.17

Drawdowns

QQQT vs. FEPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQT drawdown since its inception was -22.50%, roughly equal to the maximum FEPI drawdown of -23.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQT and FEPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQT	FEPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.50%	-23.56%	+1.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.73%	-12.91%	+0.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-1.45%	+1.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.01%	-3.51%	-0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.62%	3.84%	-0.22%

Volatility

QQQT vs. FEPI - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI) at 3.31%. This indicates that QQQT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQT	FEPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.04%	3.31%	+0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.20%	12.58%	-1.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.61%	16.54%	-1.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.24%	19.02%	+1.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.24%	19.02%	+1.22%

QQQT vs. FEPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQT has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FEPI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQT vs. FEPI - Dividend Comparison

QQQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.16%, less than FEPI's 23.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF	23.92%	25.48%	27.18%	4.21%
QQQT Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF	19.16%	21.27%	10.35%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQT and FEPI in my portfolio?

QQQT and FEPI have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQT or FEPI?

QQQT has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to FEPI (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQT dropped -22.50% vs FEPI's -23.56%.

Which ETF is better, QQQT or FEPI?

On 1-year performance, QQQT leads with 34.63% vs 33.15% for FEPI. On fees, FEPI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FEPI has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQT or FEPI?

Over the 1-year period, QQQT has performed better with a 34.63% return vs 33.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQT or FEPI?

FEPI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for QQQT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQT or FEPI?

FEPI has the higher dividend yield at 23.92%, compared with 19.16% for QQQT.

What is the main difference between QQQT and FEPI?

QQQT is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while FEPI is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for QQQT and 0.65% for FEPI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.