QQQT.TO vs. HUTE.TO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

QQQT.TO (Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged) and HUTE.TO (Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQT.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted Index, while HUTE.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest. QQQT.TO is passively managed, while HUTE.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, QQQT.TO returned 69.05% vs 19.83% for HUTE.TO. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. QQQT.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HUTE.TO.

Performance

QQQT.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQT.TO achieves a 31.89% return, which is significantly higher than HUTE.TO's 13.26% return.

QQQT.TO

• 1D: 0.98%
• 1M: 16.57%
• YTD: 31.89%
• 6M: 30.01%
• 1Y: 69.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HUTE.TO

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 13.26%
• 6M: 13.34%
• 1Y: 19.83%
• 3Y*: 16.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQT.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
QQQT.TO Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged	31.89%	30.06%	28.22%	15.37%
HUTE.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF	13.26%	19.04%	18.15%	-0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQT.TO and HUTE.TO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023	-0.06

Return for Risk

QQQT.TO vs. HUTE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQT.TO

QQQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 84
QQQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
QQQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
QQQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 85
QQQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
QQQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

HUTE.TO

HUTE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 59
HUTE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
HUTE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
HUTE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 51
HUTE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
HUTE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQT.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQQT.TO	HUTE.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.21	1.75	+1.47
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.90	2.50	+1.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.32	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.10	4.26	-0.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.52	11.24	+4.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQQT.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.21, which is higher than the HUTE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQT.TO and HUTE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQQT.TO	HUTE.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.21	1.75	+1.47
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.46	1.12	+0.34

Drawdowns

QQQT.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.32%, which is greater than HUTE.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQT.TO and HUTE.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQT.TO	HUTE.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.32%	-18.36%	-11.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.37%	-4.57%	-12.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.73%	+3.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.11%	-3.86%	-1.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.59%	1.74%	+2.85%

Volatility

QQQT.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Volatility Comparison

Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO) at 4.96%. This indicates that QQQT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HUTE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQT.TO	HUTE.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.31%	4.96%	+1.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.09%	9.78%	+7.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.63%	11.41%	+10.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.25%	14.34%	+11.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.25%	14.34%	+11.91%

QQQT.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQT.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than HUTE.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQT.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than HUTE.TO's 9.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
HUTE.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF	9.15%	9.64%	10.24%	10.70%	1.61%
QQQT.TO Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged	0.23%	0.30%	0.38%	0.25%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQT.TO and HUTE.TO in my portfolio?

QQQT.TO and HUTE.TO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQQT.TO or HUTE.TO?

On fees, QQQT.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQT.TO or HUTE.TO?

QQQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HUTE.TO.

What is the main difference between QQQT.TO and HUTE.TO?

QQQT.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while HUTE.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Evolve and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QQQT.TO and 0.50% for HUTE.TO.