QQQT.TO vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QQQT.TO (Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - QQQT.TO tracks the Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted Index while QQQM tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QQQT.TO returned 54.93% vs 39.10% for QQQM. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQT.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

QQQT.TO vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

QQQT.TO is traded in CAD, while QQQM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQT.TO achieves a 24.22% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 20.43% return.

QQQT.TO

• 1D: -3.63%
• 1M: 1.53%
• YTD: 24.22%
• 6M: 22.63%
• 1Y: 54.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQM

• 1D: -3.41%
• 1M: 2.35%
• YTD: 20.43%
• 6M: 18.43%
• 1Y: 39.10%
• 3Y*: 29.31%
• 5Y*: 19.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQT.TO vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
QQQT.TO Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged	24.22%	30.06%	28.24%	14.98%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	20.43%	15.33%	36.33%	11.36%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQT.TO and QQQM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023	0.73

The correlation between QQQT.TO and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.86 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

QQQT.TO vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQT.TO

QQQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 69
QQQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
QQQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
QQQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 69
QQQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
QQQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 66

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 60
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 59
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQT.TO vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQT.TO	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.18	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	2.86	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.38	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.18	3.22	-0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.54	10.41	+1.13

QQQT.TO vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQT.TO and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQQT.TO vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.32%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -32.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQT.TO and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQT.TO	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.32%	-32.26%	+1.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.37%	-12.21%	-5.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.57%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.82%	-3.41%	-2.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.42%	-7.54%	+2.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.77%	3.77%	+1.00%

Volatility

QQQT.TO vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.82% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 9.28%. This indicates that QQQT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQT.TO	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.82%	9.28%	+2.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.84%	14.73%	+5.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.19%	18.09%	+6.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.78%	23.29%	+7.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.78%	23.21%	+7.57%

QQQT.TO vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQT.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QQQT.TO vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

QQQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than QQQM's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.44%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%
QQQT.TO Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged	0.24%	0.30%	0.39%	0.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQT.TO and QQQM in my portfolio?

QQQT.TO and QQQM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQQT.TO or QQQM?

On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQT.TO or QQQM?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QQQT.TO.

What is the main difference between QQQT.TO and QQQM?

QQQT.TO tracks Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Evolve and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QQQT.TO and 0.15% for QQQM.