PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQS vs. QQQO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQS vs. QQQO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQS vs. QQQO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
0.79%23.03%7.91%
QQQO.L
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP
-9.15%14.61%7.07%
Different Trading Currencies

QQQS is traded in USD, while QQQO.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the QQQO.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQS achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly higher than QQQO.L's -9.15% return.


QQQS

1D
1.77%
1M
-5.87%
YTD
0.79%
6M
3.60%
1Y
53.03%
3Y*
8.90%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQO.L

1D
-4.71%
1M
-8.05%
YTD
-9.15%
6M
-7.11%
1Y
9.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQS vs. QQQO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQO.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQQS vs. QQQO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQS
QQQS Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QQQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQO.L
QQQO.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
QQQO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQS vs. QQQO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQSQQQO.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.73

0.55

+1.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.33

0.80

+1.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.12

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

0.70

+2.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.80

3.02

+7.78

QQQS vs. QQQO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQS Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the QQQO.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQS and QQQO.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQSQQQO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

0.55

+1.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.40

-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between QQQS and QQQO.L is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

QQQS vs. QQQO.L - Dividend Comparison

QQQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, less than QQQO.L's 99.83% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
3.45%3.48%0.80%0.68%0.04%
QQQO.L
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP
99.83%124.53%17.93%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QQQS vs. QQQO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQS drawdown since its inception was -38.06%, which is greater than QQQO.L's maximum drawdown of -18.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQS and QQQO.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQSQQQO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.06%

-21.70%

-16.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.53%

-11.72%

-4.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.82%

-10.18%

+2.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.83%

-4.80%

-9.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.80%

3.16%

+1.64%

Volatility

QQQS vs. QQQO.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L) at 6.25%. This indicates that QQQS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQSQQQO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.13%

6.25%

+3.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.99%

10.48%

+9.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.76%

17.59%

+13.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.42%

17.51%

+10.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.42%

17.51%

+10.91%