PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQS vs. ALTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQS vs. ALTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) and Global X Alternative Income ETF (ALTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQS vs. ALTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
-0.97%23.03%10.20%-1.94%6.56%
ALTY
Global X Alternative Income ETF
2.00%11.07%10.88%10.58%5.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQS achieves a -0.97% return, which is significantly lower than ALTY's 2.00% return.


QQQS

1D
4.87%
1M
-6.39%
YTD
-0.97%
6M
2.84%
1Y
49.21%
3Y*
8.27%
5Y*
10Y*

ALTY

1D
0.92%
1M
-3.20%
YTD
2.00%
6M
5.15%
1Y
10.74%
3Y*
10.06%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
6.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQS vs. ALTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ALTY's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQQS vs. ALTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQS
QQQS Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QQQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

ALTY
ALTY Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ALTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALTY Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ALTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALTY Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQS vs. ALTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) and Global X Alternative Income ETF (ALTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQSALTYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

1.11

+0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.20

1.54

+0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.27

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

1.27

+1.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.71

6.72

+3.00

QQQS vs. ALTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQS Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the ALTY Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQS and ALTY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQSALTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.11

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.32

+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between QQQS and ALTY is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QQQS vs. ALTY - Dividend Comparison

QQQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than ALTY's 7.51% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
3.51%3.48%0.80%0.68%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ALTY
Global X Alternative Income ETF
7.51%7.50%7.88%7.31%7.66%6.88%9.20%8.74%8.49%7.52%8.20%4.21%

Drawdowns

QQQS vs. ALTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQS drawdown since its inception was -38.06%, smaller than the maximum ALTY drawdown of -51.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQS and ALTY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQSALTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.06%

-51.47%

+13.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.53%

-8.52%

-8.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.42%

-3.46%

-5.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.84%

-6.85%

-6.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.78%

1.61%

+3.17%

Volatility

QQQS vs. ALTY - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) has a higher volatility of 10.32% compared to Global X Alternative Income ETF (ALTY) at 2.90%. This indicates that QQQS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQSALTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.32%

2.90%

+7.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.93%

4.65%

+15.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.79%

9.68%

+21.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.42%

10.77%

+17.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.42%

16.63%

+11.79%