PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQP vs. SHRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQP vs. SHRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQP achieves a 36.32% return, which is significantly higher than SHRT's -17.46% return.


QQQP

1D
0.84%
1M
18.29%
YTD
36.32%
6M
32.45%
1Y
77.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SHRT

1D
-1.72%
1M
-4.33%
YTD
-17.46%
6M
-16.25%
1Y
-22.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQP vs. SHRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQP
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF
36.32%30.21%10.88%
SHRT
Gotham Short Strategies ETF
-17.46%-0.91%-7.77%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQP and SHRT is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024

-0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQP vs. SHRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQP
QQQP Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QQQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQP Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQP Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SHRT
SHRT Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
SHRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHRT Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SHRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHRT Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQP vs. SHRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQPSHRTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.45

-1.72

+4.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.94

-2.55

+5.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

0.73

+0.65

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

-0.99

+4.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.62

-2.18

+13.80

QQQP vs. SHRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQP Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the SHRT Sharpe Ratio of -1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQP and SHRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQPSHRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

-1.72

+4.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

-0.80

+1.96

Drawdowns

QQQP vs. SHRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQP drawdown since its inception was -42.50%, which is greater than SHRT's maximum drawdown of -25.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQP and SHRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQPSHRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.50%

-25.98%

-16.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.35%

-22.73%

-2.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-25.98%

+25.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.35%

-8.09%

+0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.92%

10.30%

-3.38%

Volatility

QQQP vs. SHRT - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) has a higher volatility of 8.99% compared to Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT) at 4.26%. This indicates that QQQP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQPSHRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.99%

4.26%

+4.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.63%

10.99%

+13.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.06%

13.04%

+19.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.85%

12.78%

+31.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.85%

12.78%

+31.07%

QQQP vs. SHRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQP has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SHRT's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQP vs. SHRT - Dividend Comparison

QQQP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.


PositionTTM202520242023
QQQP
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHRT
Gotham Short Strategies ETF
0.08%0.07%0.85%0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQP and SHRT have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQP has higher volatility (8.99%) compared to SHRT (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQP dropped -42.50% vs SHRT's -25.98%.

On 1-year performance, QQQP leads with 77.97% vs -22.30% for SHRT. On fees, QQQP is cheaper at 1.30% per year. On volatility, SHRT has been the lower-risk option at 4.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQP has performed better with a 77.97% return vs -22.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQP is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for SHRT.

SHRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.08%, compared with 0.00% for QQQP.

QQQP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SHRT is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Gotham. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QQQP and 1.35% for SHRT.

QQQP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs -1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQP and SHRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer