PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQP vs. SHRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQP vs. SHRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQP achieves a 24.11% return, which is significantly higher than SHRT's -15.76% return.


QQQP

1D
-3.72%
1M
-3.56%
6M
19.17%
YTD
24.11%
1Y
47.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SHRT

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.56%
6M
-13.08%
YTD
-15.76%
1Y
-16.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQP vs. SHRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQP
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF
24.11%30.21%9.30%
SHRT
Gotham Short Strategies ETF
-15.76%-0.91%-7.58%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQP and SHRT is -0.47, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024

-0.51

The correlation between QQQP and SHRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.51 to -0.47 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQP vs. SHRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQP
QQQP Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
QQQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQP Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQP Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

SHRT
SHRT Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SHRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHRT Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SHRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHRT Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQP vs. SHRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQPSHRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.81

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

-0.80

+2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.57

-1.82

+8.39

QQQP vs. SHRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQP Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the SHRT Sharpe Ratio of -1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQP and SHRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQP vs. SHRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQP drawdown since its inception was -42.50%, which is greater than SHRT's maximum drawdown of -27.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQP and SHRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQPSHRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.50%

-27.84%

-14.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.35%

-21.39%

-3.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.96%

-24.45%

+15.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.25%

-8.76%

+1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.24%

9.35%

-2.11%

Volatility

QQQP vs. SHRT - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) has a higher volatility of 14.77% compared to Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT) at 5.38%. This indicates that QQQP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQPSHRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.77%

5.38%

+9.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.96%

12.02%

+16.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.67%

14.05%

+21.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.38%

12.99%

+31.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.38%

12.99%

+31.39%

QQQP vs. SHRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQP has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SHRT's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQP vs. SHRT - Dividend Comparison

QQQP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.


PositionTTM202520242023
QQQP
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHRT
Gotham Short Strategies ETF
0.08%0.07%0.85%0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQP and SHRT have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQP has higher volatility (14.77%) compared to SHRT (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQP dropped -42.50% vs SHRT's -27.84%.

On 1-year performance, QQQP leads with 47.44% vs -16.96% for SHRT. On fees, QQQP is cheaper at 1.30% per year. On volatility, SHRT has been the lower-risk option at 5.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQP has performed better with a 47.44% return vs -16.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQP is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for SHRT.

SHRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.08%, compared with 0.00% for QQQP.

QQQP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SHRT is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Gotham. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QQQP and 1.35% for SHRT.

QQQP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQP and SHRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer