QQQP vs. CMGG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

QQQP (Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF) and CMGG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQP charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CMGG.

Performance

QQQP vs. CMGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQP achieves a 25.19% return, which is significantly higher than CMGG's -34.81% return.

QQQP

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: -2.16%
• YTD: 25.19%
• 6M: 21.20%
• 1Y: 55.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CMGG

• 1D: 4.34%
• 1M: -9.17%
• YTD: -34.81%
• 6M: -37.93%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQP vs. CMGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQQP Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF	25.19%	1.24%
CMGG Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF	-34.81%	36.20%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQP and CMGG is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.21

Return for Risk

QQQP vs. CMGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQP

QQQP Risk / Return Rank: 50
QQQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
QQQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
QQQP Omega Ratio Rank: 47
QQQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
QQQP Martin Ratio Rank: 52

CMGG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQP vs. CMGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQP	CMGG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.84	—	—

Drawdowns

QQQP vs. CMGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQP drawdown since its inception was -42.50%, smaller than the maximum CMGG drawdown of -56.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQP and CMGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQP	CMGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.50%	-56.75%	+14.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.17%	-45.94%	+37.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.27%	-23.52%	+16.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.07%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QQQP	CMGG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.57%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.51%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.60%	68.93%	-34.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.38%	68.93%	-24.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.38%	68.93%	-24.55%

QQQP vs. CMGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQP has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CMGG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQP vs. CMGG - Dividend Comparison

Neither QQQP nor CMGG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQP and CMGG in my portfolio?

QQQP and CMGG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQQP or CMGG?

On fees, CMGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQP or CMGG?

CMGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QQQP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQP or CMGG?

QQQP and CMGG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QQQP and CMGG?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QQQP and 0.75% for CMGG.