QQQO.L vs. QYLD.L
QQQO.L (IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP) and QYLD.L (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QQQO.L is actively managed, while QYLD.L is passively managed. Over the past year, QQQO.L returned 23.01% vs 15.88% for QYLD.L. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.45% expense ratio.
Performance
QQQO.L vs. QYLD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QQQO.L is traded in GBp, while QYLD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QYLD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQO.L achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD.L's 4.85% return.
QQQO.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.01%
- 6M
- 7.79%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 23.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD.L
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- -3.73%
- 6M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- 4.85%
- 1Y
- 15.88%
- 3Y*
- 10.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQO.L vs. QYLD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQO.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP | 9.54% | 10.65% | 8,328.72% |
QYLD.L Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.85% | -2.14% | 15.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQO.L and QYLD.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2024 | 0.52 |
The correlation between QQQO.L and QYLD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQO.L vs. QYLD.L — Risk / Return Rank
QQQO.L
QYLD.L
QQQO.L vs. QYLD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (QYLD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQO.L | QYLD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.28 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | 3.39 | -2.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.22 | 11.47 | -10.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQO.L vs. QYLD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQO.L drawdown since its inception was -27.28%, which is greater than QYLD.L's maximum drawdown of -24.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQO.L and QYLD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQO.L | QYLD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.28% | -24.76% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.28% | -4.66% | -22.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.28% | -4.66% | -12.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.50% | -5.50% | -6.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.85% | 1.37% | +17.48% |
Volatility
QQQO.L vs. QYLD.L - Volatility Comparison
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L) has a higher volatility of 6.26% compared to Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (QYLD.L) at 5.02%. This indicates that QQQO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQO.L | QYLD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.26% | 5.02% | +1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.38% | 8.81% | +2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.83% | 10.67% | +33.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5,462.45% | 16.77% | +5,445.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5,462.45% | 16.77% | +5,445.68% |
QQQO.L vs. QYLD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QQQO.L and QYLD.L have an expense ratio of 0.45%.
Dividends
QQQO.L vs. QYLD.L - Dividend Comparison
QQQO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 78.67%, more than QYLD.L's 11.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQO.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP | 78.67% | 128.94% | 17.93% | 0.00% |
QYLD.L Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 11.85% | 11.41% | 12.28% | 10.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQO.L and QYLD.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQO.L and QYLD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Global X.
Find the right allocation for QQQO.L and QYLD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer