QQQO.L vs. EQGB.L
QQQO.L (IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP) and EQGB.L (Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QQQO.L is actively managed, while EQGB.L is passively managed. QQQO.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EQGB.L.
Performance
QQQO.L vs. EQGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QQQO.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EQGB.L
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- 4.21%
- YTD
- 16.01%
- 6M
- 15.05%
- 1Y
- 34.69%
- 3Y*
- 26.53%
- 5Y*
- 15.79%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQO.L vs. EQGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
QQQO.L
EQGB.L
QQQO.L vs. EQGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQO.L | EQGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.93 | — |
Drawdowns
QQQO.L vs. EQGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQO.L | EQGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -36.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -3.19% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -7.45% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.17% | — |
Volatility
QQQO.L vs. EQGB.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQO.L | EQGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 16.01% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 20.97% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 21.25% | — |
QQQO.L vs. EQGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQO.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than EQGB.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQO.L vs. EQGB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither QQQO.L nor EQGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQGB.L Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.16% |
QQQO.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, EQGB.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EQGB.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for QQQO.L.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for QQQO.L and 0.35% for EQGB.L.
Find the right allocation for QQQO.L and EQGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer