QQQO.L vs. CNDX.L
QQQO.L (IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP) and CNDX.L (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QQQO.L is actively managed, while CNDX.L is passively managed. Over the past year, QQQO.L returned 32.91% vs 37.91% for CNDX.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQO.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CNDX.L.
Performance
QQQO.L vs. CNDX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QQQO.L is traded in GBp, while CNDX.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CNDX.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQO.L achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly lower than CNDX.L's 18.71% return.
QQQO.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- 13.58%
- 6M
- 13.39%
- 1Y
- 32.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNDX.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 18.71%
- 6M
- 18.24%
- 1Y
- 37.91%
- 3Y*
- 24.57%
- 5Y*
- 17.08%
- 10Y*
- 22.12%
QQQO.L vs. CNDX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQO.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP | 13.58% | 10.65% | 8,328.72% |
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 17.99% | 11.22% | 15.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQO.L and CNDX.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2024 | 0.63 |
The correlation between QQQO.L and CNDX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQO.L vs. CNDX.L — Risk / Return Rank
QQQO.L
CNDX.L
QQQO.L vs. CNDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQO.L | CNDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.40 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 3.40 | -2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.79 | 9.47 | -7.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQO.L vs. CNDX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQO.L drawdown since its inception was -27.28%, roughly equal to the maximum CNDX.L drawdown of -27.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQO.L and CNDX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQO.L | CNDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.28% | -27.78% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.28% | -11.11% | -16.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.23% | -2.47% | -11.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.34% | -4.54% | -6.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.41% | 3.99% | +14.42% |
Volatility
QQQO.L vs. CNDX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L) is 5.48%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) has a volatility of 6.26%. This indicates that QQQO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNDX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQO.L | CNDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 6.26% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.05% | 12.78% | -2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.50% | 16.62% | +26.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5,557.03% | 20.26% | +5,536.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5,557.03% | 20.16% | +5,536.87% |
QQQO.L vs. CNDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQO.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CNDX.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQO.L vs. CNDX.L - Dividend Comparison
QQQO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 73.94%, while CNDX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQO.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP | 73.94% | 128.94% | 17.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQO.L and CNDX.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CNDX.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CNDX.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for QQQO.L.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for QQQO.L and 0.33% for CNDX.L.
Find the right allocation for QQQO.L and CNDX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer