QQQN vs. PCSG

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) and PCSG (Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. QQQN is passively managed, while PCSG is actively managed. QQQN charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PCSG.

Performance

QQQN vs. PCSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN) and Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF (PCSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QQQN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

PCSG

• 1D: -1.03%
• 1M: -13.86%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQN vs. PCSG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%
PCSG Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF	-8.03%

Return for Risk

QQQN vs. PCSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN) and Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF (PCSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

QQQN vs. PCSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQN drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum PCSG drawdown of -14.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQN and PCSG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQN	PCSG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-14.30%	+14.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-14.30%	+14.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-4.53%	+4.53%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QQQN	PCSG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	35.59%	-35.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	35.59%	-35.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	35.59%	-35.59%

QQQN vs. PCSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQN has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than PCSG's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQN vs. PCSG - Dividend Comparison

Neither QQQN nor PCSG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, QQQN or PCSG?

On fees, QQQN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQN or PCSG?

QQQN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PCSG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQN or PCSG?

QQQN and PCSG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QQQN and PCSG?

They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and Polen. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQN and 0.60% for PCSG.